Meeting - ACABOR February 4, 2016 (View All)
Date | Name | Group(s) | Type | Approved | File |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
02/04/2016 | ACABOR February 4, 2016 | Architecture & Community Appearance Board of Review | Minutes |
Meeting Members
Meeting Support
Meeting Overview
Scheduled: | 02/04/2016 7:30 PM |
Group(s): | Architecture & Community Appearance Board of Review |
Location: | Greenbush Auditorium |
Documents | Type | File |
---|---|---|
ACABOR February 4, 2016 | Minutes |
TOWN OF ORANGETOWN ARCHITECTURE AND COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD OF REVIEW – MEETING OF FEBRUARY 4, 2016
MEMBERS PRESENT: Blythe Yost, Chair
Brian Aitcheson Andrew Andrews
Shirley Goebel Christie Bruce Jensen
Brian Terry Deborah Stuhlweissenburg
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
ALSO PRESENT: Rick Pakola, Deputy Town Attorney; Ann Marie Ambrose,
Stenographer and Cheryl Coopersmith, Chief Clerk
Blythe Yost, Chair, called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
Ms Yost read the agenda. Hearings as listed on this meeting’s agenda which
are made a part of these minutes were held as noted below.
Maureen‘s Hair Studio Plans
Review of Sign Plans
646 Main Street, Sparkill
77.08/4/21; CS zoning district
Approved with a Condition
ACABOR #16-08
Sambrotto Minor Subdivisoin Plan
Review of Subdivision Plan Approved with
34 Clausland Mountain Road, Blauvelt Conditions
70.15/2/11; R-40 zoning district
ACABOR #16–09
Nickyritz Enterprises Plans
(150 Burrows Lane)
Review of Site/Structure Plans
150 Burrows Lane, Blauvelt
70.09/3/22; R-40 zoning district
Approved
with Conditions
ACABOR #16–10
A motion was made to adjourn the meeting by Deborah Stuhlweissenburg and seconded by Brian Terry and agreed by all in attendance. The Decisions on the above hearings, which Decisions are made by the Board before the conclusion of the meeting, are mailed to the applicant. The verbatim minutes are not transcribed, but are available. As there was no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m. The next ACABOR Meeting is scheduled for February 18, 2016.
Dated: February 4, 2016 c_}ivi.O d.oo[)M~
Cheryl Coopersmith O I
Chief Clerk Boards and Commissions
38!.::J.:JO S’J”310 Nfl\01
8S 21 LJd 01 911 9lOZ
ACABOR #16-08: Maureen’s Hair Studio Sign Plans ·Approved with a
Condition
Town of Orangetown – Architecture and Community Appearance Board of
Review Decision
February 4, 2016
Page 1of2
TO:
FROM:
Maureen Cunningham, 169 Edgewood Drive, Orangeburg, New
York 10962
Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review
RE: Maureen’s Hair Studio Sign Plans: The application of Maureen Cunningham, applicant, for Ed De Drennan, owner, for the review of Sign Plans at a site to be known as “Maureen’s Hair Studio Sign Plans”, in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown. The site is located at 646 Main Street, Sparkill, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 77.08, Block 4, Lot 21; in the CS zoning district.
Heard by the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held Thursday, February 4, 2016, at which time the Board made the following determinations:
Maureen Cunningham and Robin Foley appeared and testified. The Board received the following information:
- Sign Plans prepared by Foley Signs, undated. B. Photographs of the site and existing structure.
- Material Sheet dated December 30, 2015, signed by Maureen Cunningham. FINDINGS OF FACT:
- The Board found that 2 signs were proposed;
- Sign 1: Mounted flush to the building facade in an existing recessed area. This sign would be aluminum faced 16″ by 235″, black and magenta main fields with white lettering, not illuminated, as noted on the submitted plan.
- Sign 2: Carved PVD double sided on a pole. The shape is oval, 50″ by 30″, white main field with black and magenta lettering, not illuminated. The applicant noted that the size of the sign was reduced by 4 inches by the Zoning Board on February 3, 2016 as ZBA #16-08. The reduction in the size of the sign did not affect the colors and design of the overall appearance of the sign
The hearing was then opened to the Public. There being no one to be heard from the public, the Public Hearing portion of the meeting was closed.
3Q1.:L:W SY’:l 31 Q Mh\01
cs 21 LJd 01 81~ 9102
IH\ 0 L -.:inv·f·~ ···.·i···~;J J .:i’~u
|
1-..1 J ;\ u
ACABOR #16-08: Maureen’s Hair Studio Sign Plans· Approved with a
Condition
Town of Orangetown – Architecture and Communiyt
Review Decision
February 4, 2016
Page 2 of 2
Appearance Board of
DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony before the Board, the application was APPROVED with a Condition:
- 1. Sign 2 shall be in accordance with the dimensions approved by the Town of Orangetown Zoning Board of Appeals, ZBA #16-08, dated February 3, 2016. Revised plans shall be submitted.
The foregoing resolution was presented and moved by Bruce Jensen and seconded by Brian Terry and carried as follows; Blythe Yost, Chair, aye; Brian Terry, aye; Bruce Jensen, aye; Brian Aitcheson, aye;
Deborah Stuhlweissenburg, aye; Andrew Andrews aye and Shirley Goebel
Christie, aye.
The Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this Decision and file a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk and the Office of the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review.
Dated: February 4, 2016 n fi. n .~If~~~ OJ(/lA :_.[!
Cheryl Coopersmith UUU\, WCf46P\A;””-l’.’i
Chief Clerk Boards and Commissions
Cv‘,:.J.. ZT~
IVJ di 01 mO.;.Jr GJ T… Jfi/”
ACABOR #16-09: Sambrotto Sub Subdivision Plan: Approved Subject to
Conditions
Town of Orangetown – Architecture and Community Appearance Board of
Review Decision
February 4, 2016
Page 1of2
TO: FROM:
Jay Greenwell, 85 Lafayette Avenue, Suffern, New York, 10901
Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review
RE: Sambrotto Minor Subdivision Plan: The application Raymond Sambrotto, owner, for the review of a Subdivision Plan at a site to be known as “Sambrotto Minor Subdivision Plans”, in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown. The site is located at 34 Clausland Mountain Road, Blauvelt, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 70.15, Block 2, Lot 11 in the R-40 zoning district.
Heard by the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held Thursday, February 4, 2016, at which time the Board made the following determinations:
Jay Greenwell appeared and testified. The Board received the following items: A. Subdivision Plans prepared by Jay Greenwell, PLS dated
September 12, 2014, last revision date of December 30, 2015:
- Drawing 1 of 3: Subdivision of Property
- Drawing 2 of 3: Grading, Drainage & Utility Plan
- Drawing 3 of 3: Details
- Planning Board Decision #13-29, Preliminary Subdivision Plan Approval Subject to Conditions/ Neg. Dec., dated December 10, 2014 and ZBA #15-11, dated February 18, 2015 for Lot Area for Lots 1 and 2, and Front Yard and Side Yard Variances for Lot #1, Approved.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
- The Board found that this application is reviewing only the subdivision of property and not reviewing or approving site or architectural plans.
- The Board found that the individual sites and houses would be reviewed at the time each lot would be developed.
The hearing was then opened to the Public. There being no one to be heard from the public, the Public Hearing portion of the meeting was closed.
301.:l_j:J S\1’131~ Nh\01
£S 21: Wd et Hl1 9l0l
MM013 ~ l’~\”d 0 .:l 0 Nh\01
ACABOR #16-09: Sambrotto Sub Subdivision Plan: Approved Subject to
Conditions
Town of Orangetown – Archtiecture and Communtiy Appearance Board of
Review Decision
February 4, 2016
Page 2 of 2
DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony before the Board, the application was APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
- No grading is to take place within five feet of any property line, except as specified on the approved subdivision and site plans.
- Prior to any construction, grading or removal of trees on the site, the applicant must return to ACABOR for review and approval of any construction on the site.
- This application is reviewing only the subdivision of property and not reviewing or approving site or architectural plans.
- 4. Trees to be saved shall be protected with snow fencing to the drip line during construction
- The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Section 21-25 of the
Town of Orangetown Shade Tree Ordinance.
The foregoing resolution was presented and moved by Blythe Yost and seconded by Andrew Andrews and carried as follows: Blythe Yost,
Chair, aye; Andrew Andrews, aye; Brian Terry, aye; Shirley Goebel Christie, aye; Bruce Jensen, aye; Brian Aitcheson, aye, and Deborah Stuhlweissenburg, aye.
The Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this Decisionand file a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk and the Office of the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review.
|
Dated: February 4, 2016 ~,» ~00_~
Cheryl Coopersmtih r ~ ~
Chief Clerk Boards and Commissions
38!.:HO S’1 ~318 Mf,\01
£S zt Lld O 1 au 9lGZ
ACABOR #16-1 O: Nickyritz Enterprises Plans- Approved Subject to
Conditions
Town of Orangetown -Architecture and Community Appearance Board of
Review Decision
February 4, 2016
Page 1of3
TO: FROM:
John Ritsich, 4 Foxburn Street, New City, New York 10956
Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review
RE: Nickyritz Enterprises Plans: Application of John Ritsich, President of Nickyritz Enterprises, applicant, for Sohie Glagola, owner, for the review of Site/Structure Plans at a site to be known as “Nickyritrz Enterprises Plan”, in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown. The site is located at
150 Burrows Lane, Blauvelt, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 70.09, Block 3, Lot 22; in the R-40 zoning district.
Blythe Yost, Chair, recused herself from the proceedings of this hearing.
Heard by the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held Thursday, February 4, 2016, at which time the Board made the following determinations:
John Ritsich appeared and testified.
The Board received the following items:
- Plot Plan for Nickyritz Enterprises prepared by Atzl, Nasher & Zigler dated
October 20, 2015.
- Architectural Plans prepared by John Perkins, RA, dated October 5, 2015, issued for Construction October 9, 2015:
1 of 6: General Notes & Specs, Details
2 of 6: General Notes & Specs
3 of 6: Floor Plans
4 of 6: Section, Elevations, Details
5 of 6: Elevations
6 of 6: Cellar, First & Electrical Plans, Plumbing Dia. C. Exterior Building Material Specifications.
- Landscaping Plan prepared by Robert G. Torgersen, Landscape Architect, dated October 19, 2015.
- A copy of the Building Permit Referral dated October 28, 2015.
£S 21 lJd 0 r HlJ 9102
|
Mh\Ol-.:i~.i.:.:. c,’ ‘J 1 !”‘, ‘I !~’\Ql
FINDINGS OF FACT:
- The Board found that the proposed house would have four sides of vinyl siding with decorative stonework on the front facade in Eldorado Company in Fieldledge in Meseta, or equal. The plans would be revised to note the stonework.
- The Board found that the color of the vinyl siding would be Pewter Grey, manufactured Market Square or equal. The roof shingles would be Weathered Wood, manufactured by Timberline or equal.
- The Board found that the front entryway, garage door and trim would be white.
- The Board found that lighting would be placed by the exterior doorways, in accordance with Town Code.
- The Board found that the applicant appeared at the Town of Orangetown Zoning Board of Appeals at the February 3, 2016 meeting as ZBA #16-01 and obtained the needed variances.
The hearing was then opened to the Public. Public Comment:
Lixin Tao, 5 Celtic Lane, an abutting property owner, raised concerns regarding
the applicant’s appearance at the Zoning Board of Appeal.
(The Board noted that ACABOR reviews the site for ascetics and zoning issues are the purview of other Boards.)
Nance Wissman, 125 Burrows Lane, an abutting property owner, expressed concerns regarding the future status of an existing stone wall on site and the height of the proposed house.
There being no one else to be heard from the public, the Public Hearing portion of the meeting was closed.
DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony before the Board, the application was APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
- The proposed house will have four sides of vinyl siding with decorative stonework on the front facade in Eldorado Company in Fieldledge in Meseta, or equal. Decorative stonework shall be placed on the front facade as described by the applicant. The plans shall be revised.
- The color of the siding will be Pewter Grey, manufactured Market Square or equal. The roof shingles will be Weathered Wood, manufactured by Timberline or equal. The front entryway, garage door and trim will be white.
- Trees to be saved shall be protected with snow fencing to the drip line during construction.
- No grading is to take place within five feet of any property line, except as specified on the approved site plan.
301.:HO S~·~’l318 N/~\01
£S 21 lJd 01 BlJ 9Ifi2
N/,\013DilVJO :!.J N/.’-.01
- Lighting shall be placed by the exterior doorways, in accordance with
Town Code.
- Trees to be saved shall be protected with snow fencing to the drip line during construction.
- No grading is to take place within five feet of any property line, except as specified on the approved site plan.
The foregoing resolution was presented and moved by Brian Aitcheson and seconded Deborah Stuhlweissenburg and carried as follows: Blythe Yost,
Chair, aye; Andrew Andrews, aye; Brian Terry, aye; Shirley Goebel Christie, aye; Bruce Jensen, aye; Brian Aitcheson, aye, and Deborah Stuhlweissenburg, aye.
The Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this Decision and file a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk and the Office of the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review.
Dated: February 4, 2016 ~ ~ (_0 r1a)r~ ~ ‘ ,0
Cheryl Coopersmith ~ ~-u t ~\
Chief Clerk Boards and Commissions
JCJt.:UO s~i’.:J31Cl NMOl
ss 21 l.Jd 01 g11 grnz
|
N ll°\‘i”o\ l-::”‘iT11″0 .::D r·\r:”.Ol