Meeting Overview

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN ARCHITECTURE AND COMMUNITY APPEARANCE

BOARD OF REVIEW – MEETING OF MARCH 19, 2015

 

MEMBERS PRESENT: Jill Fieldstein, Chairperson; Deborah Stuhlweissenburg; Paul

Papay and Brian Terry

MEMBERS ABSENT: Blythe Yost and Andrew Andrews

ALSO PRESENT: Richard Pakola, Deputy Town Attorney; Ann Marie Ambrose, Stenographer and Cheryl Coopersmith, Chief Clerk

 

Jill Fieldstein, Chairperson, called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.

Ms Fieldstein read the agenda. Hearings as listed on this meeting’s agenda which are made a part of these minutes were held as noted below.

 

Bailey’s  Restaurant Awning  Plan

Review of Awning  Plan

136 East Erie Street,  Blauvelt

70.14/4/6;  CS zoning district

 

Approved  as

Presented

ACABOR #15-07

 

Rohland Site Plan

Review of Site and                                      Approved

Commercial  Subdivision  Plan                   Subject to

401-407  Western  Highway,  Tappan         Conditions

74.18/3/29,  30 & 31; LO & LI zoning  districts

ACABOR #15-10

 

 

Maloney Plans Review of Site/ Structure  Plans 60 Fischer Avenue,  Pearl River	Approved Subject to	ACABOR #15-11
68.11/2/70;  R-15 zoning  district	Conditions
Rockland  County Club Plans		ACABOR #15-12
Review of Deck Expansion  Plan	Approved  as
380 Route 9W, Sparkill	Presented
78.09/1 /24; R-80 zoning  district
Alatsas and Helmke Plans		ACABOR #15-13
Review of Site/ Structure  Plans	Approved
234 Cardean  Place, Pearl River	Subject to
68.12/6/17;  RG zoning  district	Conditions
27 Pine Glen Drive Plans Review of Addition  Plans	Approved	ACABOR #15-14
27 Pine Glen Drive, Blauvelt	Subject to
65.19/1 /42; R-40 zoning district	Conditions
Sunrise Day Camp Plans Henry Kaufmann Campground	Approved  as	ACABOR #15-15
Review of Tree House  Plan	Presented
667 Blauvelt  Road, Pearl River
69.14/1/28  and 69.10/2/21;  R-80 zoning	district

 

 

 

-·

301:.1.:l© S)IH310  NMOl Oh   t ldd   r   HdY  srnz NMQ!3~NVHO   .:!O  NMOl

 

March  19, 2015

Architecture   and Community   Appearance  Board  of Review

Town of Orangetown

 

 

 

Other  Business:   The Board reviewed Thorpe  Village   Rehabilitation     Energy Upgrade  of Windows and determined that the new windows were not a substantial change in  appearance of the building  and  did  not require ACABOR Review.   The construction would be subject to Buildings Department review and approval.

 

A motion  was made to adjourn the meeting by Jill  Fieldstein  and  seconded by Paul Papay and  agreed by all  in attendance.   The Decisions   on the above hearings, which Decisions   are made by the Board before the conclusion  of the meeting, are mailed to the applicant. The verbatim minutes are not transcribed, but are available.    As there was no further business  before the Board,  the meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m.   The next ACABOR Meeting is  scheduled for April 2,  2015.

 

Dated:   March 19,   2015

Cheryl Coopersmith

Chief  Clerk  Boards and Commissions

 

 

301.:UO    S”>!H318   NMOl

Ob  r  lJd   1    Hd8 srnz

 

NM013~N\/tl0    .:lO  NMOl

 

ACABOR  #15-07:  Bailey’s   Restaurant   Awning   Plan:  Approved   as Presented Town  of Orangetown    –  Architecture  and  Community    Appearance    Board  of Review  Decision

 

March  19, 2015

Page  1of2

 

TO:

 

 

FROM:

James    Collinshaw,    Dean   Custom    Awnings,    520   Route  303,

Orangeburg, New York 10962

Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review

 

 

RE:               Bailey’s Restaurant Awning Plan: Application of Paul Bailey, owner, (William Hartnagel, attorney for the applicant) for the review of Awning Plans at a site known as “Bailey’s Restaurant Awning  Plan” in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the

Town of Orangetown. The site is located at 136 East Erie Street, Blauvelt, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown

Tax Map as Section 70.14, Block 4, Lot 6; in the CS zoning district.

 

Heard by the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held Thursday,  March 19, 2015, at which time the Board made the following determinations:

 

James Collinshaw appeared and testified for the applicant. The Board received the following items:

 

1. Dean Custom Awnings Design Plans prepared by Ronald S. Sydoruk, P.E., dated January 15, 2015:

 

Sheet 1 :  Shed awning with enclosure over basement entrance

 

Sheet 2: 4 Window awnings on 2″d Floor windows, installed on front of building facing Erie Street

 

Sheet 3: 2 window awnings on 1st Floor windows to be installed on front of building facing Erie Street

 

Sheet 4: Shed awning with enclosure over side door entrance and stairs

 

2015. Engineering Report and Certification prepared by Ronald Sydoruk, P.E., dated January 15, 2015.

 

2015. Enlarged Photograph of building with awnings superimposed. D. Material Sheet, signed by Paul Bailey, dated January 20, 2015.
2016. Herculite Natura Material brochure, noting choices of awning material colors and swatches of awing material to be used for awnings.

 

2005. Copy of a Survey Map for D.P. Dailey, LLC, prepared by Robert R. Rahnefeld, PLS, dated February 10, 2005.

 

 

301.:idO S)IH310  NMOl

—

tlh  i:   hJd  1 ·           H,nJ srnz

–                                  .

N.M013~NV’a0   .:10  NMOl

 

 

ACABOR  #15-07:   Bailey’s   Restaurant   Awning   Plan:  Approved   as Presented Town  of Orangetown  –  Architecture    and  Community  Appearance  Board  of Review  Decision

 

March  19, 2015

Page 2 of 2

 

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT:

 

1. 1. The Board found that the colors of the awnings match the exiting signage and logos on site;  Burgundy and Tan.

 

2. The Board found that the proposed fabric awnings would be manufactured by Herculaite   Natura.  The colors of the awnings are  as follows:

 

1. a. The roof and  sides of the shed awning with enclosure   over basement entrance will be Natura #7715/ Cabernet and enclosure would be Natura #7700,  Wh The side  enclosures are removable, allowing  for use only in the winter time.

 

1. The roof and sides of the 4 window awnings on the 2nd  floor windows to be installed  on the front of the building  facing  Erie

Street will be Natura  #7715/ Cabernet  and the valances  are Natura

#7700/  Wheat.

 

1. The roof and sides  of the 2 window awnings on the  1st   floor windows to be installed on the front of the building  facing  Erie

Street will be Natura  #7715/ Cabernet.    The valances  will be Natura

#7700/ Wheat.

 

1. The roof and sides of the shed awning with enclosure over side door entrance  and stairs would be Natura #7715/ Cabernet. The Entrance would  be Natura #7700/ Wheat.   The logo would  be placed  on face peak.  The enclosures are removable, allowing  for use only in  the winter time.

 

3. 3. The Board found that the applicant  appeared at the Town of Orangetown Zoning  Board of Appeals  on March  4, 2015 and obtained  the needed zoning variances,   ZBA #15-18,   dated  March 4,  2015.

 

The hearing  was then opened  to the Public.    There being no one to be heard from the  public,  the Public  Hearing  portion of the meeting  was closed.

 

DECISION:     In view of the foregoing and the testimony before the Board, the application   was APPROVED  AS PRESENTED.

 

The foregoing  resolution  was presented and moved by Jill Fieldstein  and seconded by Brian Terry and carried  as follows; Jill Fieldstein,   aye; Blythe Yost, absent; Deborah Stuhlweissenburg,   aye; Paul Papay,  aye; Brian  Terry,  aye and Andrew Andrews,   absent.

 

The Clerk  to the  Board is  hereby authorized,   directed and empowered to sign this DECISION  and  file a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk  and  the Office of the Architecture and  Community Appearance Board  of Review.

 

Dated:  March  19, 2015               {I    /,  n  A~(/   -~O-RA–fh’iA~

Cheryl  Coopersmith                   ~\..)[../\../  ()………-             \

Chief  Clerk  Boards   and  Commissions

 

 

 

 

 

381.:L:!O    S>!”8318     NMOl

th  r lJd    1     Hd8 )lOZ

 

NM013aNV~O     .:W  NMOl

 

 

 

 

TO:

 

FROM:

John  Atzl,  Atzl,  Nasher  & Zigler,234   North  Main  Street,  New  City, New York  10956

Architecture  and Community  Appearance  Board of Review

 

 

RE:                 Rohland  Site and Commercial  Subdivision  Plans: The Application

of Aida Rohland,  owner, for the review of Site and Commercial  Subdivision  Plans at a site known as “Rohland  Site and Commercial  Subdivision  Plans”,  in accordance  with Article  16 of the Town  Law of the State of New York and

Chapter  2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.   The site is located at 401-

407 Western  Highway, Tappan,  Town of Orangetown,  Rockland  County,  New

York, and as shown on the Orangetown  Tax Map as Section  74.18,  Block 3, Lot

31; in the LO zoning district.

 

Heard by the Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown  at a meeting  held Thursday,  March 19, 2015 at which time the Board made the following  determinations:

 

John Atzl and Scott Dow appeared  and testified  for the applicant. The Board received the following  items:

1. Site Plans prepared by Atzl, Nasher & Zigler P.C., last revision date of

December  12, 2014:

Drawing  1: Overall existing  Condition  Plan, dated  October  11, 2013

Drawing 2: Commercial  Subdivision  Plan, dated  October  11, 2013

Drawing 3: Grading  & Landscape  Plan, dated September  23, 2014

 

 

1. PB #13-47, Preliminary Site Plan Approval  Subject  to Conditions,  dated

December  10, 2014

 

FINDINGS OF FACT:

 

1. The Board found that the applicant  appeared  at the Town of Orangetown Zoning  Board of Appeals  on March 4, 2015 and obtained  the needed zoning variances;  Minimum  Street  Frontage,  Minimum  Side Yard and a Town  Law 280a variance.

 

2. The Board found that there would  be no improvements  to the site with the exception  of cleaning  up the property  and the addition  of a row of arborvietie  trees  along the LI zone district,  as noted in #3.

 

3. The Board found that the proposed  row of arborvietie  trees,  presently noted on the west side of the zone  line, will be flipped  to the east side of the zone line (in the LI zone district).   The Site Plan should  be revised.

 

There  being no one else to be heard from the public, the Public Hearing portion of the meeting was closed.

 

 

 

301.:1.:H>   S)l~310   NMOl

th t lJd   1    Hd\:I  SlOZ

 

N:M013~NV~O  .:10  NMOl

 

 

DECISION:    In view of the foregoing and  the testimony before the Board,  the application  was APPROVED   SUBJECT  TO THE FOLLOWING   CONDITIONS:

 

1. 1. The proposed row of arborvietie trees,  presently  noted on the west side of the zone line, will  be flipped  to the east side  of the zone line  (in  the LI

zone district).    The Site  Plan shall be revised.

 

2. Trees to be saved shall be protected with snow fencing to the drip  line during  construction.

 

3. No grading is to take place within five feet of any property line, except as specified  on the approved site  plan.

 

The foregoing  resolution  was presented and moved by Paul Papay and seconded  by Jill   Fieldstein   and carried as follows;  Blythe Yost, aye;

Jill  Fieldstein,  aye; Deborah Stuhlweissenburg,   aye; Brian Terry,  aye and  Andrew

Andrews,  absent.

 

The Clerk  to the  Board is hereby authorized,  directed and  empowered to sign this DECISION  and file a certified copy in  the Office of the Town Clerk and the Office of the Architecture and Community  Appearance Board of Review.

Dated:   March  19,  2015              ~6mD-U.S1’v\JR

Cheryl  Coopersmith                                                            If’     ·

Chief  Clerk  Boards and Commissions

 

 

 

381.:l.:lO   S~B318   NMOl

lh ~- \Jd    1 _          HdB  Sl02

 

N~Ol3~N\1BO     30  NMOl

 

ACABOR #15-11: Maloney Plans; Approved  Subject to Conditions

Town of Orangetown  – Architecture  and Community  Appearance  Board of

Review Decision

 

March 19, 2015

Page 1of3

 

TO:      Dorothy and Michael Maloney, 60 Fischer Avenue, Pearl River, New York, 10962

FROM: Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review

 

RE: Maloney Plans: Application of Dorothy and Michael Maloney, owners, for the review of Site/ Structure Plans, at a site to be known as “Maloney  Plans”  in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown. The site is located at 60

Fischer Avenue, Pearl River, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 68.11, Block 2, Lot 70; in the R-15 zoning district.

 

Heard by the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held Thursday,  March 19, 2015, at which time the Board made the following determinations:

 

Dorothy and Michael Maloney and Barry Terach appeared and testified. The Board received the following items:

2015. Plot Plan prepared Jay Greenwell, PLS, dated December 18, 2014, last revision date of February 3, 2015.

 

1. Architectural Plans prepared Barry Terach, R.A., dated January 23, 2015: A-1: Basement & Foundation Plan

A-2: First Floor Plan

 

A-3: Second Floor Plan

 

A-4: Roof Plan

 

A-5: Front Elevation, Window Schedule and Light and Ventilation

Calculations

 

A-6: Right Site and Left Side Elevations

 

A-7: Rear Elevation, Typical Column Wrap, Covered Entry Detail and

Typical Wall Section

 

2015. A copy of the Building Permit Referral, dated January 30, 2015.

 

2015. Material Sheet signed by Dorothy Maloney, dated February 12, 2015. FINDINGS OF FACT:
2016. The Board found that the existing house would be demolished and a new house would be built on the lot.

 

 

301.:i.:H’.>   S)tH310 NM01

–   —

lb  ‘\:    \Jd   t   Hda   5102

..

tU1\Q13~N’1BO .:10  NMO!

 

 

 

2. The Board found that the proposed  house  had four sides of Hardi Plank Lap Siding  in Artie White with decorative  stonework  on the chimney  in Nantucket  Blue (grey color).  The roof would  be manufacture  by Tamko  in Virgina  Slate, the shutters  would  be light grey, manufactured   by Mid• America,  the trim would  be hardiboard  in white, to match the siding and

the railing would  be white fiberail  composite  railing. The garage  doors would  be white carriage  style with glass inserts. The air conditioning  unit would  be placed on the west side of house, on grade against the wall. The Board recommended   screening  the unit with boxwood  plants.

 

3. The Board found that the material sheet noted shutters  would be placed on the house;  however,  the plans did not indicate the location of the shutters.    The applicant  stated that the front  12 windows  would  have shutters;  the Architect  signed and dated the plan revision.

 

4. The Board found that the siding should  be brought  down to 8 inches above grade,  in accordance  with Town of Orangetown  Building  Code.

 

5. The Board found that the applicant  needed  to submit  a Landscaping  Plan.

At the meeting, the applicant  revised the submitted  site plan to note the proposed  landscaping;  the Architect  signed and dated the plan revision. The Board suggested  that the applicant  plant any type of flowering  tree at the site.

 

6. The Board found that lighting would  be in accordance  with Town of

Orangetown  safety code.

 

7. The Board found that the concerns  of the neighboring  property  owners were not in the purview of ACABOR  review.

 

Public  Comment:

 

Thomas  McGuire,  31 Salina  Road, Pearl River; raised concerns  regarding  the impact of the development  on neighborhood  drainage.

 

There  being no one else to be heard from the public, the Public Hearing  portion of the meeting  was closed.

 

DECISION:   In view of the foregoing  and the testimony  before the Board, the application  was APPROVED   SUBJECT  TO THE FOLLOWING

CONDITIONS:

 

1. The proposed house had four sides of Hardi Plank Lap Siding  in Artie White  with decorative  stonework  on the chimney  in Nantucket  Blue (grey color).  The roof would  be manufacture  by Tamko  in Virgina  Slate, the shutters  would  be light grey, manufactured   by Mid-America,  the trim would be hardiboard  in white, to match the siding and the railing would  be white fiberail  composite  railing. The garage doors would  be white carriage  style with glass inserts. The air conditioning  unit would  be placed on the west side of house, on grade  against the wall. The Board recommended screening  the unit with boxwood  plants.  Lighting will be in accordance  with Town of Orangetown  safety code.

 

 

 

30l.:L~0 S)l~31~   NMOl th _}:_  \sld    ‘t _          Hd\:l   5tOZ N~Ol3~NVHO         :30 NMOl

 

 

 

2. 2. The front 12  windows will have shutters; the Architect signed  and dated the plan  revisi

 

3. The siding shall be brought down to 8 inches  above grade, in  accordance with Town of Orangetown  Building   Code.

 

4. The landscaping plan  was acceptable.   The Board suggested adding any type of flowering tree to the plan.

 

5. Trees to be saved shall be protected with  snow fencing to the drip line during construction.

 

6. 6. No grading is to take place  within five feet of any property line, except as specified on the  approved site  plan.

 

 

The foregoing resolution  was presented and moved by Paul  Papay and seconded by Brian Terry and carried as follows;  Blythe Yost,  aye;

Jill   Fieldstein,  aye; Deborah Stuhlweissenburg,  aye;  Brian Terry,  aye and Andrew

Andrews,absent.

 

The Clerk  to the Board is  hereby authorized,  directed and empowered to sign this DECISION  and file a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk and  the Office of the Architecture and  Community Appearance Board of Review.

 

 

Dated:  March  19, 2015          ~                                ~  1J10.I\           0,1 IT\;i~

Cheryl Coopersmith                                            ~..Y””\…U          ·    .

Chief Clerk  Boards and Commissions

 

 

 

301.::UO   S>lH310     NMOl

• –

th  ! tJd      1     Hdl:J S102

 

NM013DNV’tl0   .:JO   NMOl

 

TO:

 

FROM:

James Coleman,   11     Washington   Avenue, Pleasantville, New York 10570

Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review

 

 

RE:               Rockland  County Club  Plans:   Application  of James Coleman, applicant,   for The Rockland  County Club,  Inc.,  owner,  for the review of Deck Expansion Plans,  at a site to be known as “Rockland  County Club  Plans”  in accordance  with  Article 16  of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the  Code of the Town of Orangetown.   The site is  located at 380

Route  9W,  Sparkill,  Town of Orangetown,   Rockland   County,  New York,  and as shown  on the Orangetown   Tax Map as Section  78.09,  Block 1,     Lot 24;  in the

R-80 zoning  district.

 

Heard by the Architecture  and Community Appearance Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting  held  Thursday,   March  19,  2015,  at which time the Board made the following  determinations:

 

James Coleman  appeared   and testified for the applicant.   The Board received the following  items:

 

1. A. Rockland County  Club Plans  prepare James Coleman Architecture Studio  PC, February 5,  2015:

A-000.00 Project Data

A 100.00:   Plans  and  Elevations

 

2015. B. Copy of Material Sheet, signed   by James Coleman,   dated February 5,

 

2015. C. A copy of the Building Permit  Referral,  dated February 3, 2015.

 

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT:

 

1. The Board found that the applicant  proposed to extend an existing   exterior deck approximately 20′  and  extension of the  existing  roof 8′  over the deck. The deck expansion  is over existing paved area.

 

2. The Board found that the new deck expansion   and  roof material  would match the existing  deck and  roof. The base of the deck would be stone Tuscan style  columns that match the existing  columns.   The roof

overhang  would  have shielded   recessing  lighting.  The trim  would  be white

Azek and painted metal.

 

The hearing was then opened  to the Public. There being  no one to be heard from the public,  the  Public Hearing portion  of the meeting was closed.

 

DECISION:      In view  of the foregoing   and the testimony before the Board,  the application was APPROVED  AS PRESENTED.

 

The foregoing resolution  was presented and  moved by Brian Terry and

seconded by Deborah Stuhlweissenburg   and  carried  as follows: Jill Fieldstein,  aye; Blythe Yost,  absent; Deborah  Stuhlweissenburg,  aye;  Paul Papay,  aye; Brian Terry,  aye and Andrew Andrews, absent.

 

The Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized,   directed and empowered to sign this  DECISION  and file a certified copy in  the Office of the Town Clerk  and the Office of the Architecture  and Community Appearance Board of Review.

~~0

Dated:   March  19, 2015             ~                               (l ~,~;;;;)p

Cheryl  Coopersmith                                              \     ..XX/          l   3~1        5)1)318  NMOl

Chief   Clerk   Boards  and Commissions                                                              _

1h 1   Lld    r  Hd8  Sl02

NM013~N’VtjQ   so NMOl

 

 

Town  of Orangetown    –  Architecture  and  Community  Appearance    Board  of

Review  Decision

 

 

March  19, 2015

Page  1of2

 

TO:

 

 

FROM:

George Alatsas,  17 Bluefields  Lane, Blauvelt, New York  10913

Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review

 

 

RE:                            Alatsas  & Helmke  Plans: Application  of George Alatsas, owner, for the review of Site/ Structure  Plans, at a site to be known as “Alatsas

& Helmke  Plans”   in accordance  with Article  16 of the Town  Law of the State of New York and Chapter  2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.   The site is located at 234 Cardean  Place,  Pearl River, Town of Orangetown,  Rockland County,  New York, and as shown on the Orangetown  Tax Map as Section  68.12, Block 6, Lot 17; in the RG zoning  district.

 

Heard by the Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown  at a meeting  held Thursday,   March  19, 2015, at which time the Board made the following  determinations:

 

George Alatsas  and Robert Hoene appeared  and testified. The Board received the following  items:

2015. Site Plan prepared by Sparaco & Youngblood,  dated January  20, 2015.

 

1. Architectural Plans prepared  by Robert  Hoene,  RA, last revision date of

January  22,, 2015:

 

A 1.0: Elevations  dated  March 26, 2012

 

A2.0:  Basement/  Foundation  Plan & First Floor Plan dated

March 27, 2012

 

A3.0:  General  Notes, Details & Second  Floor dated  February  20, 2012

 

2015. Material Specifications signed  by George Alatsas,  dated  February  21, 2015. D. Landscaping  Plan prepared  by Edge Landscape,  undated
2016. Tree Removal Plan. FINDINGS OF FACT:
2017. The Board found that an existing  house would  be demolished  and a new house would  be constructed  on the site.  The proposed  house would  have four sides of vinyl siding,  manufactured   by Certainteed  in Snow White  and a shingle  roof manufactured   by Timberline  in Slate. The house would

have black shutters  on two front windows,  manufactured   by Mid-America. The columns  would white  square  shaped  manufactured   by HBG.

 

 

 

301:!:10 g)tH310  NMOl

lb }_ lild     t l!dl:J   SlOZ

 

N~Ol3~NVC!O   :!O NMOl

 

 

Town  of Orangetown    –  Architecture   and Communtiy  Appearance Board of

Review  Decision

 

 

March  19,  2015

Page 2 of 2

 

 

2. The Board found that the Landscaping Plan to be acceptable, however, it was suggested  that 2 Colorado  Spruce or Maple trees be added to the back yard along George Street where the driveway was removed.

 

3. The Board found that the front porch landing would  be Bluestone. The rear patio and front walkway would be grey pavers,  manufactured  by Cambridge.

 

4. 4. The Board found  that the air conditioning  unit would  be located on the left had side of the house,  by the East George Street side  of the  property.

The Board suggested that Boxwood  plants  be placed  around  the Air

Conditioning    Unit.

 

5. 5. The  Board  found that recess lighting  would  be placed  under the porch roof and  two sconce down lit  lighting  fixtures would be placed  by the garage door

 

The hearing  was then  opened to the Public.   There being  no one to be heard from the  public,  the Public Hearing   portion of the meeting was closed.

 

DECISION:   In  view  of the foregoing   and the testimony  before the Board, the application  was APPROVED   SUBJECT  TO THE  FOLLOWING  CONDITIONS:

 

1. 1. The proposed house will have four sides  of vinyl  siding,  manufactured by Certainteed  in Snow White and shingle  roof manufactured by Timberline in Slate.  The house  will have black  shutters  on two front windows,

manufactured   by Mid-America.     The columns will  be white square shaped manufactured  by HBG.

 

2. The front porch landing  will  be Bluestone.   The rear patio and front walkway will be pavers.

 

3. 3. The air conditioning  unit will be located  on the  left  had  side  of the house, by the East George Street side  of the property.

 

4. 4. Recess lighting will be placed under the  porch  roof and two sconce down lit  lighting fixtures will be placed  by the garage doors.

 

5. Trees to be saved shall  be protected with  snow fencing to the drip  line during construction.
6. 6. No grading   is to take  place  within five feet of any property line,  except as specified   on the  approved  site  plan.

 

The foregoing  resolution   was presented   and moved by Jill  Fieldstein   and seconded  by  Deborah  Stuhlweissenburg  and  carried  as follows:   Jill  Fieldstein, aye; Blythe  Yost,  absent;  Deborah  Stuhlweissenburg,    aye; Paul  Papay,  aye; Brian  Terry,  aye and Andrew Andrews,  absent.

 

The Clerk  to the Board  is  hereby authorized,  directed  and empowered  to sign this  DECISION  and file  a certified  copy in the  Office  of the Town Clerk  and the Office  of the  Architecture and  Community  Appearance  Board  of Review.

1

 

 

Dated:   March 19,  2015            ~                           fl  ~l’\O;   Jh1,:f

,f}

 

Cheryl  Coopersmith                                       L6U\~‘””‘  •   .WJ

Chief Clerk Boards  and Commissions

 

 

301.:l.:IO    ~)HEll::l   NMOl

–                .

‘th   1   LJd   1    Hd8 srnz

 

NMQ13~N’\fhl0    :JO   NMOl

 

 

Town of Orangetown  – Architecture  and Community  Appearance  Board of

Review Decision

 

March 19, 2015

Page 1of2

 

TO: FROM:

Joseph  Chiappa,  27 Pine Glen Drive, Blauvelt,  New York  10913

Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review

 

 

RE:                 27 Pine Glen Drive Plans: Application  of Joseph  Chiappa,  owner, for the review of Addition  Plans, at a site known as “27 Pine Glen Drive Plans” in accordance  with Article  16 of the Town  Law of the State of New York and Chapter  2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.   The site is located at 27

Pine Glen Drive Plans, Blauvelt,  Town of Orangetown,  Rockland  County,  New

York, and as shown on the Orangetown  Tax Map as Section  65.19,  Block 1, Lot

42; in the R-40 zoning  district.

 

 

Heard by the Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown  at a meeting  held Thursday,  March 19, 2015, at which time the Board made the following  determinations:

Joseph  Chiappa  appeared  and testified.   The Board  received  the following  items: A. Site and Architectural   Plans prepared  by Joseph  Chiappa,  P.E., dated

December  1, 2014:

 

• SP-1-1:  Site Plan

 

• Sheet 5 of 18: Main Floor Plan

 

• Sheet 6 of 18: Second  Floor Plan

 

• Sheet  7 of 18: Roof Framing  Plan, Roof Plan Details

 

• Sheet 8 of 18: Front & Left Side Elevations

 

• Sheet 9 of 18: Rear & Right Side Elevations

 

2015. Material Sheet, signed by Joseph  Chiappa  dated  February  20, 2015. C. A copy of the Building  Permit  Referral,  dated January  28, 2015. FINDINGS OF FACT:
2016. The Board found that the applicant proposed  to add an addition  and alter the existing  house.    The proposed  addition  to the house would  have stucco and natural  stone veneer  house to match the existing  structure. The roof shingles  would  also match the exiting  roof; Spanish  style clay tile, S-type in graphite/brown.    The color scheme  of the house is limestone/brown/tan.                                      The windows  would  be Hurd Aluminum  Clad casements  in bronze.

 

2. The Board found that there are no air conditioning  units.  The house has a geothermal  heat pump which  is located  indoors.

 

The hearing was then opened  to the Public.  There  being no one to be heard from the public, the Public Hearing  portion of the meeting was closed.

 

 

 

30\.:!.:!0  S’>\~310   NMOl

th _}’._  ldd    t ·_      Hdl:I   SlOZ

 

N~Ol3~NV’tl0 .:!O  NMOl

 

 

Town  of Orangetown –  Architecture   and Communiyt Appearance    Board  of

Review  Decision

 

 

March  19, 2015

Page 2 of 2

 

 

DECISION:     In  view of the foregoing  and the testimony before the Board, the application was APPROVED   SUBJECT  TO THE FOLLOWING   CONDITIONS:

 

1. 1. The addition  to the house will  have stucco and natural  stone  veneer house to match the existing  structur The roof shingles  will  also match the exiting roof; Spanish style clay tile,  S-type in graphite/brown. The color  scheme of the house is  limestone/brown/tan.   The windows will  be Hurd Aluminum Clad  casements in bronze.

 

2. 2. Trees to be saved shall  be protected with snow fencing to the drip  line during construction.
3. 3. No grading is to take place within  five feet of any property line,  except as

specified on the approved site  plan

 

The foregoing resolution was presented  and moved by Jill   Fieldstein  and seconded by Brian Terry and carried as follows:  Jill  Fieldstein, aye;  Blythe  Yost, absent;  Deborah Stuhlweissenburg, aye;  Paul Papay, aye; Brian Terry, aye and Andrew Andrews, absent.

 

The Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized,  directed  and empowered to sign this DECISION and file  a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk and the Office of the Architecture  and Community Appearance Board of Review.

 

Dated:  March  19, 2015

Cheryl Coopersmith

Chief  Clerk Boards  and Commissions

Ceo~

 

 

 

301.:l.:lO    S)lH310        NMOl

 

‘th   I    LJ d    t   Hdl:J  5102

 

NM013DN11tl0       .:W  NMOl

 

 

Campground:  Approved  as Presented

Town of Orangetown  – Architecture  and Community  Appearance  Board of

Review Decision

 

March 19, 2015

Page 1of2

 

TO:

 

FROM:

Donald  Brenner,  4  Independence  Avenue,  Tappan,  New  York

10983

Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review

 

 

RE:               Sunrise Day Camp Tree House at Kaufmann Campgrounds Plans: Application of Nelson Treehouse and Supply, applicant, for UJA Federation of NY, owner, for the review of Treehouse Plans, at a site known as “Sunrise  Day Camp Tree House at Kaufmann  Campgrounds  Plans”  in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown. The site is located at 667 Blauvelt Road, Pearl River, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 69.14, Block 1, Lot 28; and Section 69.10, Block 2, Lot 21; in the R-80 zoning district.

 

Heard by the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held Thursday,  March 19, 2015, at which time the Board made the following determinations:

 

Donald Brenner, Sarah Torrens and Jeremy Levin appeared and testified for the applicant. The Board received the following items:

 

1. Plans prepared by Nelson Treehouse and Supply, dated March 1, 2015:

 

• Sheet 01: Vicinity Map

 

• Sheet 02: Site Plan

 

• Sheet 03: Site Plan Detail

 

• Sheet 04: Ramp and Treehouse Plan

 

• Sheet 05: Beam Support Plan

 

• Sheet 06: Main Level Floor Plan

 

• Sheet 07: Roof Plan

 

• Sheet 08: North Elevation

 

• Sheet 09: West Elevation

 

• Sheet 10: South Elevation

 

• Sheet 11  through 13: Photographs

 

2015. Material Sheet, dated March 3, 2015.

 

2015. Copy of Building Permit Referral dated March 2, 2015.

 

 

301.:1.:10  S~H310 NMOl

—                                          .

th     L  tJd     t   Hdl:J Sl02

 

NM0!3f>NVHO  .:W  NMO!

 

ACABOR  #15-15:  Sunrise Day Camp Treehouse  at Henry Kaufmann

Campground:   Approved as Presented

Town of Orangetown –  Architecture  and Community Appearance  Board  of

Review  Decision

 

 

March 19, 2015

Page 2 of 2

 

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT:

 

1. 1. The Board found that the structure would be constructed of natural  wood with  a wood cedar shingle  roof. The tree house would have a steel  under structure/engineer   strut support to be painted red/brown.

 

2. 2. The Board found that the project was in  partnership  with the Discovery

Channel  and Sunrise Day Camp.

 

The hearing was then opened to the Public.

 

The hearing was then  opened to the Public.   There being no one to be heard from the public, the Public  Hearing  portion  of the meeting was closed.

 

DECISION:     In  view  of the foregoing  and the testimony before the Board,  the application   was APPROVED   AS PRESENTED.

 

The foregoing  resolution  was presented and moved by Jill  Fieldstein  and seconded by Brian   Terry and carried as follows:  Jill  Fieldstein,   aye;  Blythe Yost, absent;  Deborah Stuhlweissenburg,   aye; Paul  Papay,  aye; Brian Terry,  aye and Andrew Andrews, absent.

 

The Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized,  directed and  empowered to sign this DECISION and  file  a certified  copy in the Office of the Town  Clerk and the Office of the Architecture and Community  Appearance Board of Review.

Dated:  March  19, 2015                 .> £ n  ,       0  ~ ,,,,.,    ,..,.(\   P J  f}~

Cheryl Coopersmith                     ~~                            LPY~’-

Chief Clerk Boards  and Commissions

 

 

 

381.:l.:lO    S>!H318    NM01

 

U,  1   tJd    1    Hdl:l   5102

 

NM013~N’1tl0     .:JO     NMOl