Meeting Overview

TOWN  OF ORANGETOWN   ARCHITECTURE   AND COMMUNITY  APPEARANCE BOARD OF REVIEW – MEETING  OF MAY 7, 2015

 

MEMBERS PRESENT:  Jill  Fieldstein, Chairperson;  Andrew Andrews, Brian  Terry, and Paul  Papay, aye, Deborah Stuhlweissenburg

MEMBERS ABSENT:  Blythe Yost

ALSO PRESENT:  Robert Magrino,  Deputy Town Attorney; Ann  Marie Ambrose, Stenographer and  Cheryl Coopersmith,  Chief Clerk

 

Jill Fieldstein,  Chairperson,  called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.

Ms Fieldstein   read the agenda.   Hearings as listed on this  meeting’s agenda which are made a part of these minutes were held as noted below.

 

Skae Training Center Fence/Wind Screen Plan                    ACABOR #15-19

Review of Fence with  Wind  Screen Plan           Approved  as

76.08/1/3   & 4;  LIO zoning  district                        Presented

 

Skae Training Center Shed Plan

Review of Storage Shed Plan

76.08/1 /3 & 4; LIO zoning district

 

Approved as

Presented

ACABOR #15–20

 

Greenstar RestaurantOutdoor Dining Plan

Review of Outdoor Dining Plan

68.12/5/27;   CC zoning district

 

Approved as

Presented

ACABOR #15-21

 

88 SparkillAvenue Plans

Review of Site/Structure  Plans

77.08/3/71.2;    R-15 zoning district

 

Approved Subject to Conditions

ACABOR #15-22

 

 

SMK–Erie Subdivision

Review  of Site/Structure  Plans

70/13/1/21.7     (Lot  5)         Approved Subject to Conditions   ACABOR #15-23

70.13/1/21.4 (Lot  3)         Approved Subject to Conditions    ACABOR #15-24

70.13/1/21.5    (Lot  1)         Approved Subject to Conditions     ACABOR #15-25

R-15  zoning district

 

A motion  was made to adjourn the meeting by Jill  Fieldstein  and seconded by Andrew Andrews and agreed by all in attendance. The Decisions  on the above hearings,  which Decisions   are made by the Board before the conclusion  of the meeting,  are mailed to the applicant.   The verbatim minutes are not transcribed, but are available.    As there was no further business before the Board,  the meeting was adjourned at 9:45  p.m.   The next ACABOR Meeting is scheduled for May 21,   2015.

 

Dated:  May 7, 2015

 

 

301.::1.:10    S>ltl310    NM©l

–

Zl   T  lJd    0 2  AHW    5102

 

Nfn013~N\1l:W     .:lG   NA\01

 

ACABOR  #15-19:    Skae  Training  Center   Fence/Wind   Screen  Plan:  Approved

As  Presented

Town   of Orangetown      –  Architecture  and  Community  Appearance    Board   of

Review   Decision

May  7, 2015

Page   1   of  1

 

TO:

 

FROM:

Donald Brenner,  4 Independence Avenue, Tappan, New York,  10994

Architecture and Community Appearance Board  of Review

 

 

RE:                Skae I Columcille   Properties Plans:   Application  of Peter Skae, owner,  (Donald   Brenner,  attorney for the applicant)  for the review of the installation  of a fence/wind screen plan  at a site known as “Skae Training Center Fence/Wind   Screen  Plan”,  in  accordance with Article  16  of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.   The site  is  located  at 337 – 339 Blaisdell   Road, Orangeburg, Town of Orangetown,   Rockland County,  New York,  and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map  as Section  76.08,   Block  1,     Lots 3 & 4 in the LIO  zoning  district.

 

 

Heard by the Architecture  and Community Appearance  Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown  at a meeting  held  Thursday, May 7,  2015,  at which time the Board  made the following  determinations:

 

Donald   Brenner and Peter Skae appeared  and testified.   The Board received the following  items:

 

1. Site Plans prepared by Sparaco & Youngblood,  PLLC dated

September 12,  2014,   last  revision  date of March  2,  2015: Drawing 1   of 2: Final  As Built

Drawing 2 of 2: Overall  As Built

 

Photographs of fence with windscreen

 

1. B. Material  Sheet,  signed  by Peter Skae.

 

2015. C. Copy of the Building  Permit Referral,  dated January  26, 20

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT:

 

1. 1. The Board found  that the fence and wind screen existed  and appeared on site  as presented  in the photograph;   black fence with black windscreen

and  red lettering.

 

2. The Board found that the Town of Orangetown Zoning Board of Appeals observed  May 6,  2015  as ZBA #15-35, that the wind screen did not constitute a sign.

 

The hearing was then opened  to the Public.  There being no one to be heard from the public,   the Public   Hearing   portion of the meeting  was closed.

 

DECISION:     In  view  of the foregoing   and the testimony   before the Board,  the application   was APPROVED  AS PRESENTED.

 

The foregoing resolution   was presented  and  moved  by Brian Terry and seconded   by Andrew Andrews   and  carried  as follows:   Jill  Fieldstein,   Chairperson, aye;  Blythe  Yost, absent;  Andrew Andrews,  aye;  Brian  Terry,  aye;  Paul  Papay,  aye and  Deborah   Stuhlweissenburg,    aye.

 

The  Clerk  to the  Board is  hereby  authorized,   directed  and  empowered to sign this  Decision   and file  a certified   copy in the Office of the Town Clerk  and  the

Office  of the Architecture and  Community Appearance  Board of Review.

 

Dated:  May 7, 2015                         ()1 ~t //J~/J/J~

Cheryl  Coopersmith,   Chief  ClerkB~al91s a~~skions

 

301.:UO    ~)!B31~    NMOl

ii ~– Lld    02  ~BlJ  ~lO

.N~Ol3;)Ni1’MO   so NMO

 

ACABOR  #15-20:  Skae  Training  Center  Storage Shed Plan: Approved As

Presented

Town of Orangetown –  Architecture and Community Appearance Board  of

Review  Decision

May 7, 2015

Page  1  of 1

 

TO:

 

FROM:

Donald  Brenner,   4 Independence  Avenue,  Tappan, New York,  10994

Architecture  and  Community   Appearance   Board of Review

 

 

RE:                 Skae I Columcille  Properties Plans:   Application of Peter Skae, owner,  (Donald   Brenner,  attorney for the applicant)  for the  review  of the installation  of a storage shed at a site  known as “Skae  Training Center  Shed Plan”,  in  accordance with  Article   16 of the Town  Law of the State of New York and  Chapter   2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.  The site is located at

337 – 339 Blaisdell   Road,  Orangeburg,  Town of Orangetown,  Rockland County, New York, and  as shown on the Orangetown  Tax Map as Section 76.08,   Block 1, Lots 3 & 4 in  the LIO zoning  district.

 

 

Heard by the Architecture and Community  Appearance Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown  at a meeting held  Thursday, May 7, 2015, at which time the Board made the following determinations:

 

Donald   Brenner and Peter Skae appeared and testified.  The Board received the following   items:

 

1. Site Plans prepared by Sparaco & Youngblood, PLLC dated

September 12,  2014,  last revision date of March 2,  2015: Drawing  1   of 2: Final  As Built

Drawing 2 of 2:  Overall As Built

 

1. Material Sheet, signed  by Peter Skae.

 

1. C. Installation Instruction  Sheet  of Carport/Storage Shelters,  Versatube  Building

System,  Model# DW-201875.

 

2015. D. Copy of the Building  Permit  Referral, dated January 26,  2015.

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT:

 

1. The Board found that the Storage Shed had already been installed.

 

2. 2. The Board found that the Storage Shed is  located on the  far side of the existing building  on the site, noted on the site plan as “Storage “

 

3. 3. The Board found  that the shed would  be constructed of metal and match the colors  of the existing building;  grey and  red.

 

The hearing  was then opened to the Public.    There being  no one to be heard from the public,  the Public  Hearing portion of the meeting was closed.

 

DECISION:    In view  of the foregoing   and the testimony before the Board,  the application  was APPROVED   AS PRESENTED.

 

The foregoing resolution   was presented and moved by Jill  Fieldstein   and seconded by Deborah Stuhlweissenburg and carried as follows:  Jill Fieldstein, Chairperson,   aye;  Blythe  Yost,   absent;   Andrew  Andrews,  aye;  Brian  Terry,  aye; Paul Papay,  aye and Deborah  Stuhlweissenburg,  aye.

 

The Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized,   directed   and empowered to sign this Decision  and file a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk and the Office of the  Architecture  and Community Appearance Board of Review.

 

Dated:  May 7, 2015                     ~(2   ~   1~

 

 

 

 

 

~)\’cl31~  NMOl

 

Cheryl Coopersmith, Chief Cler   B  .      fds  and ¢’ommissoi ns

3~\;!;!()

I c:rn2

 

i1.  \.  Lld     oz ~~lu  JW

–    —        ·o  .lQ Nk\01

Nt+.Of3~N-q’ti      _,

 

ACABOR  #15-21:     Greenstar Restaurant Outdoor Dining  – Approved as

Presented

Town  of Orangetown –  Architecture   and Community  Appearance   Board  of

Review  Decision

May 7, 2015

Page 1  of 1

 

TO:

 

FROM:

Franqui! Zotamba Molina, 163 North Middletown  Road, Pearl  River, New York 10965

Architecture   and Community  Appearance  Board of Review

 

 

RE:               Greenstar Restaurant Outdoor   Dining  Plan:  Application of The Greenstar  Restaurant  Corp.,   applicant  for Kormusis  Pappas Associates, owner, for the review of an Outdoor Dining  Plan, at a site known as “Greenstar Restaurant Outdoor Dining  Plan”, in  accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York  and Chapter  2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.   The site  is  located at 163 North Middletown  Road,  Pearl  River, Town of Orangetown,  Rockland  County, New York,  and  as shown on the Orangetown  Tax Map as Section  68.12,   Block 5, Lot 27;  in the CC zoning district.

 

Heard  by the Architecture   and Community Appearance  Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown  at a meeting  held  Thursday,  May 7,  2015, at which  time the Board  made the following  determinations:

 

Franqui!  Zotamba appeared and testified. The Board received the following items:

1. Photographs of the railing, umbrellas, furniture, and paving used at the outdoor dining area.

 

1. B. Site Plan  depicting  location of outdoor dining area in relation  to existing restauran

 

FINDINGS   OF FACT:

 

1. 1. The Board found that the yellow  highlighted  area on the Site Plan depicted  the proposed  location to be the outdoor dining  area.   This area had been used as outdoor  dining for a previous  tenant at the site

 

2. 2. The Board found that the applicant  proposed to place  6 tables  with chairs and  umbrellas  at the outdoor dining   area,  with  a festive decorative appea The chairs  and  umbrellas   would be green.

 

3. 3. The Board found that lighting   at the site would  be down l

 

4. 4. The Board found  that there were no residences   abutting  the outdoor dining

 

5. 5. The Board found that the applicant  received a Special Permit from the

Zoning Board  of Appeals  on May 6,  2015 as ZBA #15-33.

 

No Public  Comments

 

DECISION:    In  view  of the foregoing  and  the testimony before the Board, the application was APPROVED  AS PRESENTED.

 

The foregoing resolution  was presented and  moved by Paul Papay and seconded  by Jill  Fieldstein  and carried as follows:  Jill  Fieldstein,  Chairperson,  aye; Blythe Yost,  absent;  Andrew Andrews, aye; Brian Terry,  aye; Paul Papay, aye and Deborah Stuhlweissenburg,   aye.

 

 

The Clerk  to the Board  is  hereby authorized,  directed  and empowered to sign                   01 this Decision  and file  a certified  copy in the  Office of the Town Clerk-51~p.:!~   (3)\’tl31~    NM Office of the Architecture  and CommuniYi  Appeaa.e    oaanrd of Revffi_w.               ., ~”tJ  S\U?. Dated:  May 7, 2015                     ~·Jh  ~  rJ fort~                                                         6\  \.  \Jd   Qc,

Cheryl Coopersmith,  Chief Cle1i<B~ras ancfl ommissions               ·    ––         .0   ~O   Nf!l\Gl

tHt\Gi3~N’fcl.     –

 

TO: FROM:

Marc Comito,   P.E.   Box 300,   West  Nyack,  New York 10994

Architecture   and Community  Appearance    Board of Review

 

 

RE:                              88 Sparkill   Avenue   Plans:    Application   of Comito

Construction     Company,    applicant,    for Snedens  Land Holding    LLC,   owner for the review  of Site/Structure   Plans,    at a site  to be known   as “88  Sparkill   Avenue Plans”,   in accordance  with  Article   16  of the Town  Law of the State of New York and  Chapter    2 of the Code of the Town  of Orangetown.   The site  is  located   at 88

Sparkill   Avenue,   Sparkill,    Town  of Orangetown,     Rockland    County,   New York,   and as shown   on  the Orangetown  Tax Map as Section   77.08,  Block 3,  Lot 71.2;    in

the R-15 zoning  district.

 

Heard by the Architecture    and Community  Appearance    Board of Review   of the Town of Orangetown    at a meeting   held   Thursday,   May 7,  2015,  at which time the Board made the  following   determinations:

 

Jay Greenwell,    Marc Comito  and Robert  Hoene    appeared  and  testified. The Board received   the following    items:

2015. A. Site Plan   prepared  by Jay Greenwell,     PLS,   dated  September  10,  2014, revised on March   24, 2015.

 

1. B. Architectural  Plans   prepared  by Robert  Hoene,  RA,  dated  March  5,  2013, revised   March   24,  2015:

 

A 1.0:    Elevations

 

A2.0:    Foundation     Plan   & First Floor   Plan

 

A3.0:   General    Notes,  Second  Floor & Roof Plans

 

1. Exterior Building   Material   Specifications.

 

2015. D. Landscaping  Plan   prepared  by Yost Design   dated April   13,   2015. E.  Copy of Building    Permit  Referral   dated  March 30,  2015.

FINDINGS  OF FACT:

 

1. 1. The Board found  that the site  is  vacant  and  was part of a subdivision     in

2006,   known   as the  “Mackinnon    Subdivision     –  94 Sparkill Avenue.”  The Board noted the subdivision     drawing    SP-02,     Note #3 “Five  6″ caliper trees,  White  Pine,   Pinus   Strobus to be located   by Architect  on the West side   of new driveway  for screening  purposes.   (Trees to be 6′ to 8″  high)”

 

2. The Board found that the proposed  house would   have four sides of horizontal    vinyl   siding    in Savannah  Wicker,   manufactured     by Certainteed with  shake style  siding   on the  front  gables.   The Board  recommended     that the shake style  siding    be added to all the gables   on the house.   After the Public   Comment  session,    the Board gave the applicant    the option   of darker  house colors;   dark brown or olive   green.

 

3. 3. The Board found that the trim boards,    soffits   and fascia   would  be vinyl/aluminum/PVC      in  white,   or a color  to match the darker  house color schem    The roofing   material    would  be  Tamko  Heritage    architectural

style  shingles   in black.    The front  porch  and steps would  be constructed    of wood  and  the front walk  would   be concrete   and the  front  door would   be black.

301.:l.:10   ~)0:1310    NM®l a~ _t_ lJd    02  ~mJ  srnz NM.Ol3DN\ft10   so NMOl

 

ACABOR  #15-22:     88 Sparkill  Avenue  Plans – Approved Subject to

Conditions

Town  of Orangetown  –  Architecture   and Communtiy Appearance   Board of

Review  Decision

May 7, 2015

Page 2 of 3

 

 

4. 4. The Board  found that the front elevation   would  be revised  from a two car garage to a single  car garag The garage door would be a carriage style with  simulated divided light  windows.  Coach style  lanterns   would be placed on the sides of the front door and by the garage  door.

 

5. 5. The Board found that the Landscape  Architect, Blythe  Yost,  is  an ACABOR Board  Member,   however, the  applicant   had no special  benefit employing  Ms Yo  Blythe Yost was not in attendance for the proceedings of this meeting.

 

6. The Board found the project site was not located in an Historic District, however the neighbors  felt the area had  a historic flavor.  After the Public Comment session, the Board recommended that the applicant meet with area residents to discuss the  proposed color  of the  house and the placement of trees.

 

7. The Board found that in the event the placement of the trees differs from the Landscaping  plan presented at the meeting, the Building   Inspector would have the authority  to determine the final  placement  of trees.

 

Public  Comment:

 

Robert Dybec, 94 Sparkill Avenue, reviewed the history of the lot.   He noted that Sparkill Avenue is a peaceful place  and the streetscape  has architecturally significant  houses  on it and not regular tract houses.  Mr. Dybec raised  concerns regarding the integration of the house  into the neighborhood   and wanted to keep the  neighborhood   peaceful and green.

 

Jordan  Baker-Kilner,   80 Sparkill Avenue, raised  concerns  regarding the placement of trees on the site that would affect the views of the neighboring properties.    She requested that the applicant plant the trees sometime in the future.

 

Margaret Dybec,  94 Sparkill  Avenue, provided by the Board  with examples of two houses from Kopak Lane  in  Palisades  built by Marc Comito, the builder  of this application,  that used a different  type of siding and coloring  that appeared  more historic  than the proposed colors.   She presented the Board with photographs  of the two other color  selections  (dark  brown and olive green)  that she believed would look  better than the color  chosen by the  homeowner.    Ms Dybec

discussed  the strong community in the neighborhood  and that she wanted  the

new people to be part of the neighborhood.

 

Dennis  Lanni,   98 Sparkill Avenue, requested  more trees to be planted   on the site,  possibly  evergreen  trees on the east side  of the property.

 

There being  no one  other to be heard from the  public,  the Public Hearing portion of the meeting was closed.

 

DECISION:    In view  of the foregoing  and the testimony  before the Board, the application was APPROVED   SUBJECT  TO THE FOLLOWING   CONDITIONS:

 

 

 

301.:UO   S)HEllO  NMGl

–

ZI 1   Wd    o ~  ~BlJ  srnz

 

NM013~NVHO    .:W  NMOl

 

 

 

1. 1. The proposed  house  would  have four sides  of horizontal    vinyl siding in

Savannah   Wicker,  manufactured   by Certainteed    with  shake style  siding

on the front  gables.   Shake  style  siding   shall   be added  to all the gables   on the  house. The applicant    has the option of darker  house colors;  dark brown or olive  green.   The house  plan shall   be revised to note the shakes on the gables.

 

2. 2. The trim  boards,  soffits and fascia  shall   be vinyl/aluminum/PVC      in white, or a color  to match the darker  house color  scheme.    The roofing  material will be Tamko  Heritage  architectural    style   shingles  in    The front porch and steps will   be constructed   of wood  and the front walk will be concrete    and  the  front door will be black.

 

3. 3. The front elevation    shall   be revised  from a two car garage to a single  car garag  The garage door will  be a carriage  style with simulated  divided

light  windows.   Coach  style lanterns   will be placed   on the sides of the front door and by the garage door.   Revised   plans shall be submitted.

 

4. 4. The project  site is  not located   in a Historic   District,   however the neighbors felt  the area had  a historic   flavor.    After the Public   Comment  session,  the Board recommends   that the applicant   meet with  area residents  to discuss the proposed  color  of the house and the  placement    of trees.   In the event the proposed  placement  of the trees  differs   from the Landscaping  plan presented  at the meeting,   the Building   Inspector   would  have the authority to determine  the final  tree location.

 

5. 5. Trees to be saved shall   be protected  with  snow fencing  to the drip line during  construction.
6. 6. No grading  is  to take place within   five feet of any property  line,   except as specified  on  the approved  site  pla

 

The foregoing  resolution    was presented  and moved  by Andrew  Andrews and seconded  Jill   Fieldstein    and carried  as follows:   Jill  Fieldstein,    Chairperson,   aye; Blythe Yost,  absent; Andrew  Andrews,  aye; Brian Terry,  aye; Paul  Papay, aye and Deborah  Stuhlweissenburg,    nay.

 

The Clerk  to the  Board is  hereby  authorized,    directed  and empowered  to sign this   Decision    and file  a certified  copy in the Office  of the Town  Clerk  and the Office  of the Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review.

 

 

G,

Dated:  May 7,  2015                       ~                If  _               ~–/1    _

Cheryl  Coopersmith                                     L-6D  ~           t-:

Cheryl  oopersmith, Chief Clerk  B,-   rds and cJmmissions

 

 

 

301.:l.:W   S)!H31~    NM.Cl

 

at  t  lJd     02   ~mJ  )102

 

NM013~NV~O   so NMOl

 

 

 

TO: FROM:

Sean Keenan,  24 Waters  Edge, Congers, New York 10920

Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review

 

 

RE:                             SMK –  Erie  Subdivision   –  Lot #5 Plans:  Application  of SMK Home Builders  Inc.,   owner for the review of Site/Structure  Plans,  at a site to be known as “SMK–Erie Subdivsi ion  –  Lot #5″,  in  accordance with Article  16  of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.    The site is located  on Private  Del  Regno Court,  Blauvelt,    Town of Orangetown,   Rockland   County,  New York,  and as shown  on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section  70.13, Block  1,     Lot 21. 7; in the R-15 zoning  district.

 

Heard by the Architecture   and Community Appearance  Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown  at a meeting held Thursday,  May 7, 2015,  at which time the  Board made the following determinations:

 

Jay Greenwell,   Sean  Keenan  and Robert Hoene  appeared   and testified. The Board received the following   items:

2015. Site Plan prepared  by Jay Greenwell,   PLS,  dated  March 30,  2015.

 

8. 8. Architectural  Plans  prepared by Robert Hoene, RA, dated March 5,  2013, revised  April  14,  2015:

 

A 1.0: Elevations

 

A2.0:    First Floor And Second Floor  Plans

 

A3.0: General   Notes, Sections,  And Second Floor  Plans

 

1. C. Exterior Building   Material  Specifications.

 

2015. D. Landscaping  Plan prepared by Yost Design dated April  14,  201

 

2015. Copy of Building Permit Referral  dated March 31,   2015.

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT:

 

1. 1. The Board found that the proposed house would  have four sides  of vinyl siding   with  decorative  stonework  on the front facad The color  of the siding   would  be Pacific  Blue, manufactured  Market Square  and  the decorative  cultured  stone would  be manufactured by Eldorado Stone Company in  Clearview Rustic  Ledge.  Matching stonework  would  be placed  on the chimney and the house  trim would  be white.   The roof shingles  would  be Pewter Grey,  manufactured   by Timberline.   Crown moldings   would  be placed  over the front windows  with keystones in the center of the crown. The house plans  would  be revised  to note grills on the upper and lower  windows.

 

2. 2. The Board found  that the house would  have white trim and coach style lighting  would be placed  by the exterior  doorway, in  accordance  with Town Code.

 

3. 3. The Board found  that the air  conditioning   unit would  be as noted  on the submitted  Landscaping  plan.

 

 

–

381.:1.:10   §)1~31~   NM61 er  1   tJd     o 2  ~rrw   srnz NM013DNVtlO   .:IQ  Nh\01

 

ACABOR  #15-23:      SMK-  Erie Subdivision  – Lot #5 – Approved Subject to

Conditions

Town of Orangetown  – Architecture  and Community  Appearance  Board of

Review Decision

May 7, 2015

Page 2 of 2

 

 

 

There being   no one  other to be heard from the public,  the Public Hearing  portion of the meeting  was closed.

 

DECISION:    In view of the foregoing  and  the testimony  before the Board,  the application   was APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:

 

1. 1. The proposed house will  have four sides of vinyl  siding  with decorative stonework  on the front facade.  The siding will be Pacific Blue  color, manufactured  Market Square and  the decorative cultured  stone will  be manufactured by Eldorado   Stone Company in  Clearview  Rustic Ledge. Matching   stonework will  be placed  on the chimney  and the  house  trim will be whit   The roof shingles   will  be Pewter Grey, manufactured  by Timberline. Crown moldings will  be placed  over the front windows with keystones in  the center of the crown.  The house plans  will  be revised  to note grills on the upper and lower  windows.

 

2. 2. The house will  have white  trim and coach style exterior  lights  by the exterior  doorways, in  accordance with Town Code.

 

3. 3. The air  conditioning    unit shall  be located as noted on the submitted

Landscaping Plan.

 

4. 4. Trees to be saved shall   be protected with snow fencing  to the drip line during  construction.

 

5. 5. No grading   is to take place within five feet of any property line,  except as specified  on the approved site  plan.

 

5. The applicant shall  comply with  the requirements of Section  21-25  of the

Town of Orangetown   Shade  Tree Ordinance.

 

The foregoing  resolution   was presented  and  moved by Jill Fieldstein  and seconded Andrew Andrews and carried  as follows:  Jill  Fieldstein,   Chairperson,   aye; Blythe  Yost,  absent;  Andrew Andrews, aye; Brian  Terry,  aye; Paul  Papay,   aye and Deborah  Stuhlweissenburg,   aye.

 

The Clerk  to the Board is  hereby  authorized,  directed  and empowered   to sign this Decision   and file a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk  and  the Office of the Architecture  and Community  Appearance  Board of Review.

Dated:  May 7,  2015                       /’: ~     (2 r»: ‘1/i   ~

Cheryl Coopersmith,  Chief Clerl<‘B~2j’ds a~issions

 

 

 

-301~.:W    S>ltEllO    NMGl

–

C”I    t  Wd     0 2   AHl:J !i102

NA\013DN~t.W    so  NMOl

 

AMENDMENT TO ACABOR #15-23:       SMK-   Erie Subdivision· Lot #5 • Approved  Subject to Conditions  Town of Orangetown  – Architecture  and Community  Appearance  Board of Review Decision

 

June 5, 2015

TO: FROM:

 

Sean Keenan,  24 Waters  Edge, Congers,  New York 10920

Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review

 

 

RE:                          Amendment  to SMK –  Erie Subdivision  –  Lot #5 Plans: The applicant   appeared  at the May 7, 2015  meeting  and presented  plans for the review of Site/Structure   Plans, at a site to be known as “SMK-Erie  Subdivision

–  Lot #5”,  in accordance  with Article  16 of the Town  Law of the State of New

York and Chapter  2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.   The site is located on Private  Del Regno Court, Blauvelt,  Town of Orangetown,   Rockland  County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown  Tax Map as Section  70.13,  Block  1, Lot 21. 7; in the R-15 zoning district.

 

The Decision,  ACABOR  #15-23  shall be Amended  as follows:

 

Delete the Bold and Underlined  sentence  in Findings  of Fact #1

 

1. The Board found that the proposed house would  have four sides of vinyl siding with decorative  stonework  on the front fa9ade.  The color of the siding would  be Pacific Blue, manufactured   Market Square  and the decorative cultured  stone would  be manufactured   by Eldorado  Stone  Company  in Clearview  Rustic Ledge.   Matching  stonework  would  be placed on the chimney  and the house trim would  be white.  The roof shingles  would  be Pewter Grey, manufactured   by Timberline.  Crown  moldings  would  be placed over the front windows  with keystones  in the center of the crown. The house plans would  be revised to note grills on the upper and lower windows.

 

Replace the deleted sentence  with the sentence  in Bold:

1. The Board found that the proposed house would  have four sides of vinyl siding with decorative  stonework  on the front facade,  The color of the siding would  be Pacific Blue, manufactured   Market Square  and the decorative cultured  stone would  be manufactured   by Eldorado  Stone  Company  in Clearview  Rustic Ledge.   The house trim would  be white.  The roof shingles  would  be Pewter Grey, manufactured   by Timberline.  Crown

moldings  would  be placed over the front windows  with keystones  in the center of the crown. The house plans would  be revised to note grills on the upper

and lower windows.

 

 

 

Delete the Bold and Underlined  sentence  in DECISION, Condition  #1

 

1. The proposed house will have four sides of vinyl siding with decorative stonework on the front facade,  The siding will be Pacific  Blue color, manufactured   Market Square  and the decorative  cultured  stone will be manufactured   by Eldorado  Stone  Company  in Clearview  Rustic Ledge. Matching stonework  will  be placed on the chimney  and The house trim will be white.   The roof shingles  will be Pewter Grey, manufactured   by Timberline.  Crown  moldings  will be placed over the front windows  with keystones  in the center  of the crown. The house  plans will be revised to note grills on the upper and lower windows.

 

The Clerk to the Board is hereby  authorized,  directed  and empowered  to sign

this Amendment  to the Decision  and file a certified  copy in the Office of the Town Clerk and the Office of the Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review.

 

Dated: June 5, 2015

Cheryl Coopersmith,  Chief Clerk Boa

0  S>~~ 318 NA\Ol re n  lJ8    s   Nnr  srn2 fJ !.\ 013  0 il Vu J .:i ;J     ;  : t: D l

 

ACABOR  #15-24:     SMK –  Erie Subdivision   – Lot #3 – Approved Subject to

Conditions

Town of Orangetown – Architecture  and CommunityAppearance Board of

Review Decision

May 7,  2015

Page 1  of 2

 

 

TO: FROM:

Sean Keenan,   24 Waters Edge, Congers, New York 10920

Architecture   and Community Appearance Board of Review

 

 

RE:                           SMK –  Erie  Subdivision   –  Lot #3 Plans:  Application  of SMK Home Builders   Inc.,   owner for the review  of Site/Structure  Plans,   at a site to be known as “SMK–Erie Subdivision  –  Lot #3″, in accordance  with Article 16  of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the  Code of the Town of Orangetown.    The site  is  located  on  Private Del  Regno Court, Blauvelt,   Town of Orangetown,   Rockland County, New York,  and as shown  on the Orangetown Tax Map  as Section  70.13,    Block  1, Lot 21.4;  in  the  R-15  zoning  district.

 

Heard  by the Architecture  and  Community  Appearance  Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown  at a meeting  held  Thursday,   May 7, 2015,   at which  time the Board made  the following  determinations:

 

Jay Greenwell,  Sean Keenan  and Robert Hoene  appeared and  testified. The  Board received the following   items:

2015. Site Plan prepared by Jay Greenwell,   PLS, dated March 18, 2015.

 

1. B. Architectural Plans  prepared by Robert Hoene, RA,  dated March 5, 2013, revised April 14,  2015:

 

A1.0:  Elevations

 

A2.0:    Foundation  and First Floor  Plan

 

A3.0: General  Notes, Second Floor  Plan,   Typ.  Wall  Section

 

1. C. Exterior Building  Material   Specification

 

2015. Landscaping Plan prepared by Yost Design dated April  14,  2015.

 

2015. E. Copy of Building  Permit  Referral  dated  March 31,  2015.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT:

 

1. 1. The Board found that the proposed  house would  have four sides  of Slate color  vinyl  siding  manufactured by Market Square with  5 inch  white trim around  the windows,  no shutters.    The roof shingles   would  be Pewter Grey, manufactured   by Timberline.

 

2. 2. The Board  found that the garage doors would be white and in  the carriage style with glass  inserts.  Coach style  lighting   fixtures would  be placed by

the exterior  doorways, in  accordance  with Town Code.

 

3. 3. The Board found that the air conditioning   unit would be as noted on the submitted   Landscaping   Plan.

 

 

 

There being  no one  other to be heard  from the public,  the  Public  Hearing   portion of the  meeting  was closed.

 

DECISION:    In view  of the foregoing  and the testimony  before the Board,  the application  was APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:

 

 

381.:1.:10    S)!tl310   NMOl

 

£ ~  _t_ LJd     0 2  ~HlJ  SWZ

 

NM013DN’t~O    .:JO  NMOl

 

 

 

ACABOR #15-24:      SMK-    Erie  Subdivision    – Lot #3 -Approved   Subject to

Conditions

Town  of Orangetown    –  Architecture   and  Community    Appearance    Board  of

Review  Decision

May 7,  2015

Page 2 of 2

 

 

 

1. 1. The proposed  house will   have four sides  of Slate   color  vinyl  siding manufactured   by Market Square  with  3.5   inch  white  trim around  the windows,  no shutters.    The roof shingles   will  be Pewter  Grey, manufactured   by Timberlin

 

2. The garage doors will be white and in the carriage style  with glass  inserts.

Coach style  lighting  fixtures  will  be placed   by the exterior  doorways,  in accordance   with Town Code.

 

3. 3. The air conditioning    unit  shall   be located  as noted on the submitted

Landscaping   Plan.

 

4. 4. Trees to be saved shall be protected  with  snow fencing   to the drip line during  constructio

 

5. 5. No grading is  to take place  within  five feet of any property  line,  except as specified  on the  approved  site plan.

 

 

6. 6. The applicant  shall   comply   with  the requirements  of Section   21-25  of the

Town of Orangetown  Shade  Tree  Ordinance.

 

The foregoing  resolution   was presented  and moved  by Jill   Fieldstein    and seconded  Andrew Andrews  and carried  as follows:   Jill  Fieldstein,   Chairperson, aye;  Blythe Yost, absent; Andrew  Andrews,  aye; Brian Terry,  aye;  Paul   Papay, aye and Deborah   Stuhlweissenburg,     aye.

 

The Clerk  to the Board is  hereby authorized,   directed  and empowered  to sign this Decision    and file a certified  copy  in the Office of the Town  Clerk and the Office of the Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review.

Dated:May7,2015                          f\k–(2  ~J,20~

Cheryl Coopersmith,  Chief  Clerk )(o~~s and Cor1lmissions

 

 

301.:l.:W   9)1tl310    NM@l

er  1   (Jd    02  AHtJ    5102

 

N/n013~Nl1tl0   .:10  Nii\Ol

 

ACABOR  #15–25:      SMK –  Erie Subdivision   – Lot #1  – Approved   Subject to

Conditions

Town  of Orangetown –  Architecture  and Community  Appearance Board of

Review  Decision

May 7,  2015

Page 1  of 2

 

 

TO: FROM:

Sean  Keenan,  24 Waters Edge, Congers,  New York 10920

Architecture  and Community Appearance   Board of Review

 

 

RE:                             SMK –  Erie Subdivision   –  Lot #1  Plans:  Application   of SMK Home  Builders   Inc.,  owner for the review of Site/Structure Plans,  at a site to be known as “SMK–Erie   Subdivsi ion  –  Lot #1 “, in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York and  Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.   The site is  located on Private Del  Regno Court,  Blauvelt, Town of Orangetown,  Rockland  County, New York, and  as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 70.13,  Block  1, Lot 21.5; in the R-15 zoning  district.

 

Heard by the Architecture and  Community Appearance   Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown  at a meeting  held Thursday,   May 7, 2015,   at which time the Board made the following  determinations:

 

Jay Greenwell,   Sean  Keenan  and  Robert Hoene  appeared and testified. The Board received  the following items:

2015. Site Plan prepared  by Jay Greenwell,   PLS,  dated March 30,  2015.

 

1. B. Architectural Plans  prepared by Robert Hoene, RA, dated March  5,  2013, revised April  14,  2015:

 

A1.0:  Front and Rear Elevations

 

A2.0: Right & Left Side Elevations with  Foundation  Plan

 

A3.0: First Floor Plan

 

A4.0:  General  Notes,  Wall  Section & Second Floor  Plan

 

1. C. Exterior Building  Material  Specifications.

 

2015. Landscaping Plan prepared  by Yost Design dated April  14,  2015. E.  Copy of Building   Permit Referral  dated March 31,   2015. FINDINGS  OF FACT:
2016. 1. The Board found  that the proposed house  had four sides of mocha colored   vinyl  siding manufactured by Market Square.  Decorative  cultured stone would  be placed  under the porch  on the front facade, manufactured by Eldorado  Stone Company  in  Bluff Olive Grove and County Mill Stream. Dark Brown shutters would  be placed  on either  side  of the windows on the front elevation.   The porch would  have white  railing manufactured  by Tre The roof would have Weatherwood shingles,   manufactured by Timberline.

 

2. 2. The Board found that the house  lighting   would be coach lighting   by the front door as well  as all  exterior doorway  Recessed lights  would  be placed  in the soffits in  the front porch.

 

3. 3. The Board found that the air conditioning     unit would  be as noted on the submitted   Landscaping   Plan.

 

 

 

 

 

3~1.:U©   S>l~310    N.M©l

 

&.:~  _t_ lJd   02  ~HlJ   filD2

 

NN\Ol3{)N’vUO    .:W NMOl

 

ACABOR  #15–25:     SMK–    Erie  Subdivision    – Lot #1  -Approved Subject  to

Conditions

Town  of Orangetown  –  Architecture   and Community   Appearance  Board  of

Review  Decision

May 7, 2015

Page 2 of 2

 

 

 

 

There being  no one other to be heard from the public, the Public Hearing   portion of the meeting was closed.

 

DECISION:     In view of the foregoing and the testimony before the Board,  the application  was APPROVED   SUBJECT  TO THE  FOLLOWING   CONDITIONS:

 

1. The proposed house shall have four sides of mocha colored vinyl  siding manufactured   by Market Square.  Decorative cultured   stone will be placed under  the porch on the front facade, manufactured by Eldorado Stone Company in  Bluff Olive  Grove and County  Mill  Stream.  Dark Brown shutters will  be placed  on either  side of the windows on the front

elevation.   The porch will  have white  railing  manufactured  by Trek.  The roof will  have Weatherwood shingles,   manufactured  by Timberline.

 

2. 2. The house lighting will  be coach lighting  by the front door as well  as all exterior doorways.  Recessed  lights will be placed  in the soffits in the front porch.

 

3. 3. The air conditioning unit will  be located as noted  on the submitted

Landscaping    Plan.

 

4. 4. Trees to be saved shall be protected with snow fencing to the drip line during  construction.

 

5. No grading is to take place  within  five feet of any property  line,   except as specified  on the approved site  plan.

 

6. 6. The applicant shall comply  with the requirements   of Section  21-25 of the

Town of Orangetown  Shade  Tree Ordinance.

 

The foregoing resolution was presented and moved by Jill  Fieldstein  and seconded  Andrew Andrews and carried  as follows:  Jill  Fieldstein,   Chairperson,  aye; Blythe Yost,  absent;Andrew Andrews, aye; Brian Terry,  aye; Paul  Papay, aye and Deborah Stuhlweissenburg,   aye.

 

The Clerk to the  Board  is  hereby authorized,   directed and  empowered to sign this Decision  and file a certified   copy  in the Office of the Town Clerk  and the Office of the Architecture and Community Appearance  Board of Review.

Dated:  May 7, 2015                   ~l/2. I  ,a.,)i)atVz_

Cheryl  Coopersmith,   Chief  Clerk  BOrds~~ommissions

 

 

 

301.:L:lO   S>ltl31~     NMOl

 

8‘t  T  lJd    02  ~HfJ  SID2

 

~M013QNfl:IO     JO NMOl