Meeting Overview

Town of Orangetown

Architecture and Community Appearance   Board of Review

Meeting  of October  3, 2013

 

MEMBERS   PRESENT:   Thomas Warren,   Chairman;   Paul  Papay,  Vice  Chairman; Blyth  Yost;  Jill  Fieldstein;   James  Dodge; Alex DiMenna   and  Jack Messina

 

MEMBERS  ABSENT:   None

ALSO  PRESENT:   Ann Marie  Ambrose, Stenographer   and Cheryl  Coopersmith, Chief  Clerk

 

Mr. Warren,   Chairman, called  the  meeting   to order  at 7:30  p.m.

Mr.  Warren   read the agenda.    Hearings as listed  on this meeting’s   agenda which  are

made  a part  of these minutes were held  as noted   below.

 

Organic Recycling Plan Commercial    Subdivision    Plan  Review	Approved as	ACABOR #13 – 50
74.19/1 /3;  LI zoning district	Presented
Beital’sAquariumGenerator Plan		ACABOR #13 – 51
Review  of Generator  Plan 68.19/4/16;     CO zoning  district	Approvedas Presented

 

Wendy’s Plans

Review  of Facade  Improvement  Plan

77.15/1/34;      CS zoning  district

 

Approved Subject to Conditions

ACABOR #13 – 52

 

Continued Item: LoccisanoGarage Plan Review  of Structure  Plan

73.05/1/62;     R-40 zoning  district

 

 

Approved Subject to Conditions

 

ACABOR #13 – 09

 

 

A motion was made to adjourn  the meeting  by James  Dodge and seconded  by Blythe Yost and agreed  by all  in attendance.    The Decisions   on the above hearings,  which  Decisions    are made by the Board before the conclusion    of the meeting,  are mailed   to the applicant.   The verbatim  minutes   are not transcribed, but are available.     As there was no further  business  before the Board, the meeting  was adjourned  at 8:30 p.m.   The next ACABOR  Meeting   is  scheduled for October  17,  2013.

 

Dated: October 3, 2013

 

 

]01.:J.:lO   S)lt1310     NIY\Ol    .

Lh   or lJH   s    1ao   naz

 

• NMOl3 ~JrJV‘bO   .:W  NJAOl

 

ACABOR  #13-50:   Organic  Recycling  Commercial  Subdivision  Plan  – Approved  as  Presented

 

 

Town   of Orangetown  –  Architecture  and  Community  Appearance   Board   of

Review  Decision

 

 

October  3,  2013

Page  1  of 2

 

TO: FROM:

Donald  Brenner,  4 Independence  Avenue, Tappan,   New York

Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review

 

 

RE:               Organic Recycling Plans:  Application  of Organic  Recycling, applicant,  for Joseph Appleman/  Bimnel  Associates,  owners, (Donald   Brenner, attorney for the owner)  for review of a Commercial  Subdivision  Plan,  at a site to be known as “Organic  Recycling Plans”,  in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.   The site is  located  at 121   Route 303, Tappan,  Town of Orangetown,  Rockland  County,  New York,  and  as shown  on the Orangetown Tax Map  as Section  74.19,   Block 1, Lot 3 in  the LI zoning district.

 

Heard by the Architecture and Community Appearance  Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held Thursday, October 3,  2013,  at which time the  Board made the following determinations:

 

Donald  Brenner  and Cassandra  Lim appeared  and testified. The Board  received  the following items:

2. Site Plans prepared  by Jay Greenwell,  PLS,  dated November 30,  2012, Sheet 1   and Sheet 2.

 

1. B. Landscape   Plan for Organic Recycling, Outdoor Commercial   Subdivision of Space.

 

2012. Copy of Building Permit Referral to the Boards, dated April 2,  2012.

 

2013. Board Decisions:  ZBA #13-42,   Outdoor Storage,  Gravel  Parking: Approved,   dated June 5,  2013  and PB #12-35,   Preliminary Subdivision Approval Subject to Conditions/  Neg. Dec.,  dated  March 27, 2013.

 

2013. Submitted at the meeting, photographs of New Plantings at the project site, dated October 3, 2013.

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT:

 

1. The Board found that the site would be used to store landscaping vehicles overnight.  The applicant  has obtained  Preliminary Approval  from the Planning Board and the required variances from the Zoning Board  of Appeals.

 

2. The Board found that the applicant presented photographs of an existing vegetative buffer.

 

The hearing was then opened to the Public.  There  being  no one to be heard from the public,  the Public Hearing portion of the meeting was closed.

 

 

30l:1:10   S)n:t310     NMOl

 

Lh DI l&J   6     100  na2

 

NIAOl3f>Wr/tJO     .::JO  NMOl

 

ACABOR  #13-50:  Organic   Recycling  Commercial   Subdivision    Plan – Approved   as Presented

 

Town  of Orangetown -Architecture   and Community  Appearance  Board  of

Review  Decision

 

 

October 3,  2013

Page 2 of 2

 

 

DECISION:  In view of the foregoing  and the testimony before the Board, the application was APPROVED  AS PRESENTED.

 

The foregoing  resolution was presented  and moved  by Jack Messina  and seconded by Alex  DiMenna  and carried as follows: Thomas Warren,  Chairman, aye; Paul  Papay,  aye;  Jill Fieldstein,  aye;  Jack Messina, aye; James Dodge,  aye, Alex DiMenna,  aye and  Blyth Yost,  aye.

 

The Clerk  to the Board  is  hereby authorized,  directed and empowered to sign this Decision  and file a certified  copy in  the Office of the Town Clerk  and the Office of the Architecture and  Community Appearance  Board of Review.

 

 

Dated:  October 3,  2013

Town of Orangetown

Architecture  and Community Appear

 

 

301.:L:lO  S,  H310     NMOl

 

lh 01   LJtJ    6     180    El02

 

NM013vNV’tlO     JO  NM0.1

 

ACABOR  #13 – 20: Beital’s Aquariums Generator Plan –  Approved as

Presented

 

 

Town of Orangetown Architecture and Community Appearance

Board of Review  Decision

 

October 3,  2013

Page  1   of 2

 

TO:

 

FROM:

Donald Brenner,  4 Independence  Avenue,  Tappan

New York 10913

Architecture and  Community Appearance   Board of Review

 

 

RE:                Beital’s  Aquarium Generator   Plan:  The application of Craig  Beital, applicant,  for Pearl  River Properties, LLC,  owner,  for the review of a Generator Plan at a site to be known as “Beital’s  Aquarium Generator Plan”,  in accordance  with  Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.   The site  is  located at 73

Pearl Street (Route  304), Pearl River,  Town of Orangetown,   Rockland   County, New York,  and as shown  on the Orangetown.  Tax Map as Section  68.19,  Block

4,  Lot 16  in the CO zoning district.

 

Heard  by the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown  at a meeting held  Thursday,  October 3,  2013,  at which time the Board  made the following determinations:

 

Donald  Brenner and Craig  Beital  appeared and testified. The Board  received  the following items:

1. Survey of Property for Pearl River Properties,  Inc. noting the location of the proposed Generator,  prepared  by Jay Greenwell,   PLS, dated  October

12,  2012.

 

1. B. A copy of ZBA #13-54,   Performance Standards, Approved; dated

July 2,  2013.

 

2013. Copy of Building Permit Referral to the Boards,  dated  May 13,  2013.

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT:

 

1. The Board found that the applicant proposed to install a new generator  on the site.  The generator  is needed  in order to operate  the fish tank systems in the event of loss of power.

 

2. The Board found that the generator  would be placed  inside  an existing fenced  in area.

 

3. The Board found that the generator would be exercised  once a week, during the daytime.

 

The hearing was then opened to the Public.   There being no one  to be heard from the public,  the Public  Hearing  portion of the meeting was closed.

 

 

301.:l:lO    S)1tl310     NMOl

 

Lh O! LJ8   6     180   £102

 

NM013SN’1tl0      .:10  N!t\01

 

ACABOR  #13 – 20:  Beital’s Aquariums Generator  Plan -Approved  as

Presented

 

 

Town  of Orangetown  Architecture and Community Appearance

Board of Review  Decision

 

October  3, 2013

Page 2 of 2

 

 

 

DECISION:   In view  of the foregoing  and  the testimony  before the Board,   the application  was APPROVED AS PRESENTED.

 

The foregoing   resolution   was presented  and moved  by Alex DiMenna   and seconded  by Blythe  Yost and carried   as follows:  Thomas  Warren,   aye; Jack Messina,  aye;  James  Dodge, aye; Jill Fieldstein,    aye; Paul   Papay, aye;  Alex DiMenna,  aye,  and Blyth Yost,  aye.

 

Dated: October3,  2013           j}     /J         I /r.. ,                                                                              1

The Clerk to the Board  is hereby authorized,  directed  and empowered  to sign this Decision    and  file a certified  copy in the Office of the Town  Clerk and the Office of the Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review.

 

L

Town of Orangetown             G// ~tvJ   L,t!O

Architectureand CommunityAppearary:e Board of Review

 

 

301.:l.:lO    S)IB318      NMOl

Lh  01   LJ8    s    180   noz

 

NM013~NV’ti0         .:!O NhWl

 

Amendment    to ACABOR  #13-52:  Wendy’s   Facade  Plan  – Approved   Subject to Conditions

 

Town  of Orangetown    –  Architecture  and  Community    Appearance

Board  of Review  Decision

 

 

October   10,  2013

Page  1   of 1

 

TO: FROM:

Greg Dunn,  83 Spring Hill Circle, Wayne, New Jersey 07470

Architecture and Community  Appearance  Board of Review

 

 

RE:                Amendment to Wendy’s Plans: The application of Gregg Dunn, applicant,  and Orangetown Plaza Inc.,  owner,  for an Amendment to ACABOR

#13-  52,  the review of a Facade Improvement Plan at a site known as “Wendy’s Facade Improvement  Plan”,  in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town  of Orangetown. The site is located  at 3 Route 303 (Tappan Plaza), Tappan,  Town of Orangetown,  Rockland County,  New York,  and as shown on the Orangetown. Tax Map as Section  77.15,   Block 1, Lot 34 in the CS zoning district.

 

Heard by the Architecture  and Community Appearance  Board of Review  of the Town of Orangetown  at a meeting held Thursday,  October  3, 2013. The Decision shall be amended as follows;

 

DELETE THE FOLLOWING: Finding of Fact

#6. The Board found  that for pedestrian  safety, the red railing  on the drive thru side of the building should  be changed to the Route 303 side of the building.

 

Decision

#6.  For pedestrian  safety, the red railing  on the drive thru side of the building shall be changed to the Route 303 side of the building.

 

REPLACE WITH THE FOLLOWING: Finding of Fact

#6. The Board found  that for pedestrian  safety, the red railing  on the drive

thru side of the building should  be redesigned  to be “L-shaped”,  to come out of the building to the drive thru lane,  extending  towards Route 303.

 

Decision

#6. For pedestrian  safety, the red railing  on the drive thru side of the building shall be redesigned  to be “L-shaped”,  to come out of the building to the drive thru lane, extending  towards Route 303.

 

The Clerk  to the Board  is  hereby authorized,  directed and empowered  to sign this Amendment and file a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk  and the Office of the Architecture  and Community Appearance Board of Review.

 

 

Dated: October  10, 2013       0~                I       

c:      0

 

Town of Orangetown             ~                          LCD        (::)~~

Architecture  and  Community Appe   ance Board of ~ew

 

 

 

381.:UO  S)ltl3l:J    NMOl

2h    s  tJ8     11   180   noz

 

NM013~N\/i:W     .:10   NMOl

 

ACABOR  #13-52:  Wendy’s  Facade  Plan – Approved Subject to Conditions

 

 

Town  of Orangetown –  Archti ecture  and Communtiy Appearance

Board of Review  Decision

 

 

October 3,  2013

Page  1   of 2

 

TO: FROM:

Greg Dunn,   83 Spring   Hill Circle, Wayne,  New Jersey 07470

Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review

 

 

RE:                 Wendy’s   Plans:  The application   of Gregg  Dunn, applicant,   and Orangetown  Plaza Inc.,   owner,  for the review of a Facade  Improvement    Plan at a site  known as “Wendy‘s  Facade  Improvement Plan“,   in accordance  with Article

16 of the Town  Law of the State of New York and Chapter  2 of the Code of the

Town of Orangetown.   The site is located  at 3 Route 303 (Tappan   Plaza), Tappan,  Town of Orangetown,   Rockland  County,  New York, and as shown on the Orangetown.    Tax  Map as Section  77.15,    Block  1, Lot 34 in the CS zoning district.

 

Heard by the Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review of the Town  of Orangetown   at a meeting  held   Thursday, October 3, 2013,  at which time the  Board made the following   determinations:

 

Greg Dunn appeared  and testified.

 

The  Board received  the following   items:

 

1. Building  Elevations   prepared  by Jose C. Santos,   R.A., dated  March 6,

 

2013,   Wendy’s  3076 Tier-3  Standard  Remodel  Building

 

A 1.1:        Floor Plan

 

A2.1:    Exterior  Elevations  –  Left and Right Side  Elevations

 

A2.2:   Exterior   Elevations   –  Rear and Front Elevations

 

2013. Material Sheet,  dated  September  16,   2013.

 

1. C. Section of Site Plan,   noting location  of building.

 

1. Submitted  at the Meeting,   photographs  of the existing  Wendy’s landscaping  and building  and photographs  of a Wendy’s   building    with similar  improvements.

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT:

 

1. The Board found that the applicant   proposed  to improve the existing building with  Wendy’s  3076 Tier-3  Standard   Remodel   Plans.

 

2. 2. The Board found  that the  new facade  consisted    of aluminum,    glass

panels,    glass  and   brick.    The color   scheme would  be black,   brown,   beige and red.

 

301.:l.:lO     S>ltl310   NMOl

 

lh  01   Ll8    6     180  £!02

 

Nh\013~NVtJO    .:W NMOl

 

 

 

3. The Board found that the existing   landscaping  would not be disturbed during construction,   with the exception  of the holly  bushes in the front of the structure.   These bushes  would  be replaced with pavers.

 

4. 4. The Board found that the air  conditioning units  would  be updated and relocated  to the roof of the structure.

 

5. The Board found that the “Wendy’s”  sign as depicted  on the front elevation  would be internally lit. The Board noted that there was an existing  free standing  monument  sign on the site.  The signage  may need further review by the Building  Department.

 

6. The Board found that for pedestrian safety, the red railing  on the drive thru  side of the building   should be changed to the Route 303 side of the building.

 

The hearing was then opened to the Public.  There being no one to be heard from the public,   the Public  Hearing portion  of the meeting was closed.

 

DECISION:   In  view of the foregoing   and the testimony before the Board, the application  was APPROVED  SUBJECT  TO THE FOLLOWING

CONDITIONS:

 

1. The applicant shall  improve  the  existing  building   with Wendy’s  3076

Tier-3 Standard Remodel  Plans.

2. The new facade shall consist of aluminum,  glass  panels,  glass  and brick.    The color  scheme shall  be black,  brown, beige and red.
3. 3. The existing landscaping  shall  not  be disturbed  during construction, with the exception  of the holly bushes  in the front  of the  structure. These bushes shall  be replaced  with  pavers.
4. The air conditioning  units will  be updated and relocated to the roof of the structure
5. 5. The “Wendy’s”  signage as depicted  on the front elevation  is approved

in color and design,  however,  may be subject to further review by the Town Building   Department. In  addition, the Board notes that there was an  existing free standing monument sign  on the site,  which may also need further  review  by the Building  Department.

6. For pedestrian  safety, the red railing on the drive thru side of the building shall  be changed to the Route 303 side of the  building.

 

The foregoing  resolution  was presented  and moved by Jill  Fieldstein   and seconded by Paul Papay and carried as follows:  Thomas Warren,   Chairman, absent;  Paul  Papay,  aye; Jack Messina, aye;  James Dodge, aye,   Alex DiMenna, aye; Blyth  Yost,  aye,  and Jill  Fieldstein,   aye.

 

The Clerk  to the Board is hereby authorized,   directed and  empowered to sign this Decision  and  file a certified copy in the Office of the Town  Clerk  and the Office of the Architecture   and Community Appearance Board  of Review.

Dated:October3,2013              {!h&‘”/ 6{)  ,    ‘,

Town  of Orangetown                                             /J                  ·

Architecture and Community Appear    nee Boa  a of Review

301.:1.:10    S)!tl318     NMOl

Bh  01   LJ8    s    180   noz

 

NM013~NVtlO     .:W  NMOl

 

ACABOR  #13-09 –  Loccisano  Garage  Plan-  Approved   Subject  to Conditions

 

 

Town  of Orangetown    –  Architecture  and  Community    Appearance

Board  of Review  Decision

 

 

October   3, 2013

Page  1of4

 

TO:

 

 

FROM:

Salvatore  Loccisano,     264 South   Middletown    Road, Pearl   River,   New York

Architecture   and Community  Appearance    Board  of Review

 

 

RE:                  Loccisano    Garage  Plan,   a continued  item: The application   of Salvatore    Loccisano,    owner,   for review of a Structure  Plan   at a site  to be known as “Loccisano  Garage  Plan”,  in accordance   with  Article  16 of the Town  Law  of the State of New  York and   Chapter    2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown. The site is  located   at 264 South  Middletown    Road,   Pearl   River,   Town  of

Orangetown,     Rockland    County,    New York and as shown on  the Orangetown    Tax

Map as  Section  73.05,    Block 1,     Lot 62 in the R-40 zoning.

 

 

Heard by the Architecture  and  Community  Appearance   Board  of Review   of the Town  of Orangetown   at meetings  held Thursday,   March  21, June  20, September   19 and  October   3, 2013,   at which  time the Board  made   the following  determinations:

 

March  21,   2013

 

Salvatore   Loccisano    appeared    and testified. The Board   received   the  following    items:

1. Architectural Plans prepared  by  Future Steel  Buildings     Intl.  Corp, model

#A30-14,   dated   January   31,   2013.

 

1. B. Manufacturer  brochure,  Future  Builders   Internati

 

1. C. A Vicinity   Map  and  a copied   Site Plan noting   the proposed  location  for the structure,  undate

 

2013. D. Copy  of Building  Permit  Referral,    dated  February  11,       2013.

 

2013. A letter  signed by Barry  Phillips,   224 Gilbert Avenue,   Pearl   River,  an abutting  property  owner,   dated  March  18,  2013.

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT:

 

1. 1. The Board  found  that the applicant  proposed  to erect a 30 foot by 48  foot garage to store vehi   The structure  would  have 4 skylights   on  the roof and  the sides of the building  would  be  galvanized    sheet  steel  in  a Quonset hut style.

 

2. The Board  found  that the owner  stated that a wooden   structure   would   not be feasible  for him.    Currently  there are 2 sheds   on the  property,  one is wood and the other  is metal,   each measuring  1 O’   by 1 O’   in  size.

 

3. The Board found that to soften the appearance of the proposed structure, the  applicant should landscape   or screen the front  of the building.

 

4. The Board found that the proposed garage is  located  on the West side of the  site, abutting Tax Lot #73.05-1-74.     The Board  suggested  that the structure  be relocated  on the property to the east side of the site.

 

5. The Board found that  a modified or a different  structure would  be more suitable for a residential   district.

 

301.:UO  S>ltl310    NMOl

 

8h  OI  liJ8    6     180   £IOZ

 

NM013DN’1tW   .:JO  NMOl

 

 

The  applicant   requested a CONTINUATION.

 

 

 

June 20,  2013

 

Donald   Brenner  and  Salvatore  Loccisano  appeared   and testified. The Board received  the following  items:

1. A letter from Donald  Brenner dated  June 20,  2013,  with an attachment of the type of structure proposed and a section of the project site plan.

 

1. Submitted by the applicant at the meeting, a copy of a Flyer  in  opposition to the project,  placed in  neighborhood   mailboxes.

 

FINDINGS   OF FACT:

 

1. 1. The Board found that the applicant   provided   landscaping   around  the proposed structure, 10  foot high  pine  trees on either side of the garage door.

 

2. The Board found that the applicant claimed  that the chosen location  for the garage was the optimum  location   of the site  since  there  are a significant  number  of trees near the Blue  Hill  property  corner.

 

3. 3. The Board found  that the proposed landscaping   was not sufficient  and requested  additional   landscaping,    7 additional  arborvietie  trees along the west face of the building,   and 3 Norway spruce trees along  the eastern face of the Building,    each tree measuring 8 to 10  feet in heigh

 

4. 4. The Board found that the structure would  be galvanized   steel, a difficult surface to paint  and suggested   using an alternative   siding,   noted in the submitted  brochure.  The Board suggested  using  a dark color.

 

Public  Comment:

 

Barry Philips,  224 Gilbert  Avenue, raised  issues  with the applicant’s   placement of blue  tarps on the site.  Mr.  Philips  requested information regarding the size  of the proposed  garage and its  relation  to a pond on the site.

 

Mary Kunzman,   5 Kerry Court, objected to the type of proposed  garage,  noting it does  not belong in a residential  neighborhood.   Requested  information regarding what the use of the garage.

 

Lisa  Williams,   222 Gilbert  Avenue,  requested that the applicant   construct  a smaller  garage.    She  discussed   the Floor  Area  Ratio  requirement   of the site  and requested  that pine trees be placed  around  the garage.

 

Ken  Lang,  253 Gilbert  Avenue, requested information   regarding the location  of the garage.

 

April  Philips,   224 Gilbert Avenue,  expressed concerns that the garage  does not fit into the residential   neighborhood.

 

The applicant  requested  a CONTINUATION.

 

 

301.:UO S)ltl310   NM01

Bh or lJ8     s   180  noz

 

NM013DNVtJO  .:JO    NM01

 

ACABOR  #13-09   –  Loccisano  Garage   Plan-  Approved  Subject to  Conditions

 

 

Town   of Orangetown  –  Architecture  and  Community  Appearance

Board  of  Review  Decision

 

 

October  3,  2013

Page  3 of 4

 

 

September  19,  2013

 

Michael   Galea  and  Salvatore   Loccisano  appeared and testified. The Board  received  the following information.

1. Revised Site Plan, prepared by Michael   Galea,  R.A.

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT:

 

1. The Board found that the structure would be used strictly for residential use as a garage.

 

2. 2. The Board found that the materials   would be corrugated steel  sides with  a facade of stucco,  vinyl  or other material   not selected  at this    The applicant proposed to match the front of the garage in color and material with the existing house on the site.  The applicant  held that the existing woods land  adjacent to the sides of the structure would be sufficient screening.

 

3. The Board found that the applicant would return to the Board  with a selected  front facade design  and a planting plan to screen the areas requested.   The types of plants selected  should be sufficient to screen the garage at maturity.

 

Public  Comment:

 

April Philips, 224 Gilbert Avenue,  held that the proposed garage design did not belong  in a residential   neighborhood.

 

Barry Philips,    224 Gilbert Avenue,  raised  issue  with the proposed size  of the garage.

 

 

 

October 3,  2013

 

Michael   Galea  and Salvatore   Loccisano   appeared   and testified. The Board received the following information.

1. Revised Site Plan, prepared by Michael   Galea,   R.A.,

 

1. B. Presented at the Meeting, a Presentation Board noting the existing vegetation,  and  structures on the site.

 

 

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT:

 

 

301.:l.:lO  S)IH310     NMOl Bh nr l&J   6     180   £IOZ NM013DNV’t:l0   .:JO    NlAOl

 

 

 

1. The Board found that the applicant presented a plan that proposed vegetative  screening for the garage. The Board recommended  alternate plantings  to those proposed,  as well as offered  minimum heights of the plants  at time of planting:

 

1. a. American  Holly plants,   minimum height of each plant  shall  be 7 to 8 feet

 

1. b. Green  Giant  Arborvitae,  minimum height  of each plant  shall  be 7 to

8 feet

 

2. The Board found that the front of the garage would be stucco material,   as noted on the presentation  board,  and shall match  in color and material

with the existing  house on the site.  The main  field  of color  would be beige

and the trim would  be white.

 

3. The Board found that the existing  corrugated steel  sides  of the structure should  be painted  with  a warm dark green color.

 

Public  Comment:

 

April Philips,  224 Gilbert  Avenue, raised  concerns  regarding  the appearance  of the west side of the structure,  noting that the design  did not belong in a residential   neighborhood.

 

There being no other  persons to be heard from the public,  the Public Hearing portion  of the meeting was closed.

 

DECISION:    In view of the foregoing and the testimony  before the Board,  the application  was APPROVED  SUBJECT  TO THE FOLLOWING

CONDITIONS:

 

 

1. The plan shall  be revised and the applicant  shall  plant the following alternate  plantings  to those proposed:  American   Holly plants, minimum height  of each plan shall  be 7 to 8 feet and  Green  Giant  Arborvitae, minimum height  of each   plan  shall   be  7 to 8 feet.
2. 2. The front of the garage shall  be stucco,  as noted on the presentation board,  and  shall  match  in color  and  material  with the existing  house on the site.  The main  field  of color  will be beige  and  the trim would be whit
3. The existing corrugated  steel  sides of the structure shall  be painted warm dark green.
4. 4. No grading  is to take  place within five feet of any property line,  except as specified   on the approved site plan.

 

The foregoing resolution was presented   and  moved by Jill Fieldstein    and seconded  by Paul  Papay  and  carried  as follows:  Thomas  Warren,   Chairman, aye; Paul Papay,  aye; Jack Messina, nay;  James  Dodge, aye,   Alex  DiMenna, nay;  Blyth  Yost,  aye, and Jill Fieldstein,    aye.

The Clerk  to the Board is  hereby authorized,  directed and  empowered to sign this Decision   and  file  a certified  copy in  the Office of the Town Clerk  and  the Office of the Architecture   and Community Appearance Board of Re iew.

Dated:  October 3, 2013            /)     /  /J       J                      ,   ‘

Town of Orangetown            (;1/)r//ty_         ·

 

Architectuer

 

and Community Appear~te   Boar        ~i~VVB.31     NMOl

Bh  or lJH    s   1ao  noz

 

NMOl3DNVtJO    .:lO   NMOl