Meeting Overview

MINUTES

ZONING  BOARD  OF APPEALS JULY  16,  2014

 

MEMBERS  PRESENT:

JOAN  SALOMON THOMAS  QUINN

LEONARD  FEROLDI,    ALTERNATE

DANIEL  SULLIVAN,   CHAIRMAN

 

 

ABSENT:                                       MICHAEL  BOSCO

PA TRICIA  CASTELLI

 

ALSO PRESENT:                   Dennis  Michaels,  Esq.

Ann Marie  Ambrose, Deborah  Arbolino

Deputy  Town Attorney

Official  Stenographer

Administrative   Aide

 

 

 

This meeting  was called to order at 7: 00 P.M.  by Mr. Sullivan,   Chairman.

Hearings  on this meeting’s   agenda,   which  are made  a part of this meeting,   were held as noted below:

 

APPLICANTS       NEW  ITEMS: DECISIONS     SIRAGUSA 68.12   I 3 I 34; RG  zone   FRONT YARD VARIANCE APPROVED   ZBA#14-54   450 WESTERN HIGHWAY 74.10 I l I 30;  CS zone   SPECIAL PERMIT APPROVED   ZBA#14-55   BNM PROPERTIES 76.08 I 1  I 6; LIO zone   FRONT YARD, SIDE YARD, BUILDIG HEIGHT, OFF-STREET LOADING BERTH AND PARKIN   ZBA#l4-56   G     LAMONT DOHERTY     APPROVED     ZBA#14-57 EMERGENCY GENERATOR     PERFORMANCE STANDARDS     80.10  I 1  I 2; R-80 zone       CARIBEAN FOODS   APPROVED   ZBA#14-58 CPNDENSER PERFORMANCE     STANDARDS     74.19/  1   I 2;  LI zone

PUBLISHED   ITEMS

 

VARIANCES APPROVED

 

 

 

Mi mites

Page 2 of  2

 

 

In response  to requests  from the Orangetown   Planning  Board,  the Zoning  Board of Appeals:   RESOLVED,   to approve  the action  of the Chairman,   Daniel   Sullivan,  executing on behalf  of the Board   its consent to the Planning  Board  acting  as Lead Agency   for the State Environmental   Quality Review  Act (SEQRA)  coordinated  environmental   review   of actions pursuant  to SEQ RA Regulations   § 617.6    (b )(3)  the following  applications: Anellotech,  Inc. Site Plan,  401  North  Middletown   Road,  Orangeburg,   N.Y. 68.08   I 1   I

IB;  LI zone;  and FURTHER  RESOLVED,   to request   to be notified  by the Planning Board of SEQ RA proceedings,  hearings,   and determinations     with  respect  to these matters.

 

 

 

 

THE DECISIONS  RELATED  TO THE ABOVE  HEARINGS  are inserted  herein  and made part of these minutes.

 

 

The verbatim  minutes,   as recorded  by the Board’s  official   stenographer   for the above hearings,  are not transcribed.

There being no further business  to come before  the Board,   on motion  duly made,

seconded  and carried,  the meeting  was adjourned  at  9: 15   P .M.

 

Dated:    July 16,   2014

 

 

 

DISTRIBUTION: APPLICANT

TOWN  AlTORNEY

DEPUTY   TOWN  AlTORNEY TOWN  BOARD  MEMBERS

BUILDING    INSPECTOR    (Individual     Decisions) Rockland County Planning

 

ZONING  BOARD  OF APPEALS TOWN  OF ORANGETOWN

By~()/~

Deborah  Arbolino

Administrative    Aide

 

DECISION

 

 

FRONT  YARD  VARIANCE    APPROVED

 

To:  Basil Siragusa

11 Charles Street

Tappan, New York 10983

ZBA#  14-54

Date: July 16, 2014

 

 

FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown

 

 

 

ZBA#14-54: Application of Basil Siragusa for a variance from Zoning Code (Chapter 43) of the Town of Orangetown Code, Section 3.12, RG District, Group Q, Column 8  (Front Yard: 25′ required, 22′ proposed) to cover an existing stoop at an existing single family residence.  The premises are located at 11  Charles Place, Pearl River, New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 68.12, Block 3, Lot 34; in the RG zoning district.

 

 

 

Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on Wednesday, July 16, 2014 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth.

 

 

 

Basil Siragusa appeared and testified.

 

The following documents were presented:

 

1. A  copy of a survey.
2. A hand drawing of the proposed roof covering for the stoop.

 

 

 

Mr. Sullivan, Chairman, made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried unanimously.

 

On advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attomey,  counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations §617.5 (c) (9), (10), (12) and /or (13); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. Tlie motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried as follows: Mr. Feroldi, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; and Mr. Sullivan, aye. Ms. Castelli and Mr. Bosco were absent.

 

 

 

Basil Siragusa testified that he would like to cover the existing front stoop of the house to protect the entrance to the house from snow and ice; that they have owned the house for about for about thirty years; and that he can draw the existing shed on the site plan.

 

Siragusa

ZBA#14-54

Page 2 of  4

 

 

Public Comment:

 

 

No public  comment.

 

 

The Board members  made personal  inspections  of the premises  the week before  the meeting  and found them to be properly  posted  and as generally  described  on the application.

 

A satisfactory  statement  in accordance  with the provisions  of Section  809 of the General

Municipal  Law of New York was received.

 

 

Mr. Sullivan made a motion  to close the Public  Hearing  which motion  was seconded  by

Ms. Salomon  and carried unanimously.

 

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal  observation  of the property,  hearing  all the testimony  and reviewing  all the documents  submitted,  the Board  found and concluded  that the benefits  to the applicant  if the variance(s)  are granted  outweigh  the detriment  (if any) to the health,  safety and

welfare  of the neighborhood   or community  by such grant, for the following  reasons:

 

 

 

1. The requested  front yard variance  will not produce  an undesirable  change in the character  of the neighborhood   or a detriment  to nearby  properties.  Similar additions have been  constructed  in the area.

 

 

 

 

2. The requested  front yard variance  will not have an adverse  effect or impact  on the physical  or environmental   conditions  in the neighborhood   or district.  Similar additions  have been constructed  in the area.

 

 

 

3. The benefits  sought by the applicant  cannot  be achieved  by other means  feasible  for the applicant  to pursue  other than by obtaining  a variance.

 

4. The requested  front yard variance  is not substantial.

 

 

 

5. The applicant  purchased  the property  subject  to Orangetown’s   Zoning  Code (Chapter

43) and is proposing  a new addition  and/or improvements,   so the alleged difficulty was self-created,  which  consideration  was relevant  to the decision  of the Board of Appeals,  but did not, by itself, preclude  the granting  of the area variances.

 

 

 

DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board: RESOLVED, that the application for the requested  front yard variance is APPROVED; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part.

 

 

 

 

General Conditions:

 

(i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth.

 

(ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted

herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth.

 

 

 

(iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation, the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any variances being requested.

 

 

 

(iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building department shall not be

obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy.

 

 

 

(v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision. Merely obtaining a Building Permit  with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute “substantial implementation” for the purposes hereof

 

 

 

3~1.:L:!O   s;n131~  Nf.\01

 

£h 2i  Wd   s2  1nr  hlOZ

 

NMOL:l ~NVbO  .:10  l’:l-.\01

 

 

 

The foregoing   resolution   to approve  the application  for the requested   front  yard variance was presented  and moved  by Mr. Quinn,   seconded  by Ms. Salomon   and carried  as follows:    Mr. Feroldi,   aye; Ms. Salomon,   aye; Mr.  Quinn,  aye;  and  Mr.  Sullivan,   aye. Mr. Bosco   and Ms.  Castelli  were absent.

 

The Administrative    Aide to the Board  is  hereby  authorized,    directed  and empowered  to sign this decision   and file a certified  copy thereof  in the office of the Town Clerk.

 

DATED:    July 16,  2014

 

ZONING  BOARD  OF APPEALS TOWN  OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

 

DISTRIBUTION: APPLICANT

ZBA  MEMBERS SUPERVISOR

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS TOWN ATTORNEY

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY OBZPAE

BUILDING    INSPECTOR-M.M.

By—L(:,Lbf,,L–!.~=~-=–= Deborah  Arbolino

Administrative    Aide

 

 

TOWN CLERK

HIGHWAY  DEPARTMENT ASSESSOR

DEPT. of ENYIRONM ENTAL MGMT. and ENGINEERING FILE,ZBA,   PB

CHAIRMAN,    ZBA,  PB, i\CABOR

 

DECISION

 

 

SPECIAL   PERMIT   USE APPROVED

 

To: Brian and Laura Murphy

1  New Street

Sparkill,   New York  10976

ZBA # 14-55

Date:  July 16, 2014

 

 

FROM:  ZONING  BOARD  OF APPEALS:  Town  of Orangetown

 

 

ZBA#l4-55:  Application  of  450 Western  Highway  for a Special  Permit Use, pursuant  to Zoning  Code  (Chapter  43) of the Town  of  Orangetown  Code, Section 3.11, CS District, Column  3 # 8 (Other Retail I Services) for a veterinary clinic. The premises are located at 450 Western Highway, Orangeburg, New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 74.10, Block 1, Lot 30; CS zoning district.

 

 

Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on

Wednesday, July 16, 2014 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter

~fo~.                                                                                         .

 

 

Donald Brenner, Attorney and Laura Murphy appeared and testified. The following documents were presented:

1. Architectural plans dated 11 I 41 1993 by Morton Marcus, Architect. (1 page)
2. Vicinity map.
3. A letter dated June 25, 2014 from the Rockland County Department of Health signed by Scott McKane, P.E., Senior Public Health Engineer.
4. A letter dated July 13, 2014 from the County of Rockland Department of

Highways signed by Sonny Lin, P.E..

5. A memorandum dated June 23, 2014 from Michael B. Bettmann, Chief Fire

Inspector.

 

 

 

Mr. Sullivan, Chairman, made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was

.     seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried unanimously.

 

On advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney,  counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application seeks area or bulk variances for construction or expansion of a primary or accessory or appurtenant, Non-residential structure or facility involving less than 4,000 square feet of gross floor area and not involving a change in zoning or a use variance and consistent with local land use controls and is exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations §617.5 (c) (7); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried as follows: Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Feroldi, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; and Mr. Sullivan, aye.

Mr. Bosco and Ms. Castelli were absent.

 

 

 

Donald Brenner testified that this property was once an old gas station; that in 1993 the new building was built and Dr. Delemo moved into it; that since then it has been

occupied by Dr. Conenello, a Chiropractor and a Dentist; that for a short time there was a

kitchen design business in the building; that this space has been empty since Dr.

Conenello moved to a larger space; that this use would be a great use for the space; that the previous doctor saw approximately 6 patients per hour and the vet would be accommodating 2 patients per hour; so the existing parking would be sufficient; that he

building is appropriately located with respect to transportation, water supply, wa~t~”‘-‘”::q~ Nf.,\01

disposal, fire and police protection and other public facilities; that the propaJetPase wit(

not generate more traffic that there are no objecting neighbors in the audie~c~~1~g1e  62 -\nr  hlGZ

1

building has existed for twenty-five years and has been used for professi~ijll b’:ffices.        ,            ..  ~.

1

;;       ,

Nft\013 ffrl \tI’i ‘.  0  ··             0 f” l)\0

 

450 Western  Highway

ZBA#14-55

Page 2 of  4

 

 

Laura Murphy,  Veterinarian,  testified  that she would  still be traveling  to houses  for appointments;  that she needs a larger space for special treatments;  and that if an animal needed  overnight  car, a twenty-four  hour facility  would be contacted  and the animal would be taken there.

 

Public  Comment:

 

 

No public  comment.

 

 

The Board members  made personal  inspections  of the premises  the week before the meeting  and found them to be properly  posted  and as generally  described  on the application.

 

A satisfactory  statement  in accordance  with the provisions  of Section  809 of the General

Municipal  Law of New York was received.

 

 

Mr. Sullivan made a motion  to close the Public  Hearing  which motion  was seconded  by

Ms. Salomon  and carried unanimously.

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal  observation  of the property,  hearing  all the testimony  and reviewing  all the documents  submitted,  the Board  found and concluded  that the benefits  to the applicant  if the Special Permit Use is granted  outweighs  the detriment  (if any) to the health,  safety

and welfare  of the neighborhood   or community  by such grant, for the following  reasons: The proposed  use as described  and represented  by the applicant:

1. Will be appropriately  located  with respect  to transportation,   water supply,  waste

disposal,  fire and police protection  and other public  facilities.

2. Will not cause undue traffic  congestion  or create a traffic hazard.
3. Will not create at any point of determination  set forth in §§4.16, 4.17 and 4.18 any more dangerous  and objectionable   elements  referred  to in § 4.11 than is characteristic  of the uses expressly  permitted  as of right in the same district.
4. Will not adversely  affect the character  of /or property  values in the area.
5. Will not otherwise  impair  the public health,  safety,  morals,  convenience,  comfort, prosperity  and other aspects  of the general welfare  of the town.
6. Will comply with all other regulations  applicable  to such use. For all special

permit  uses a proposed  plan showing  the size and location  of the lot, design and location  of the proposed  facilities  (including  access drives, screening  and streets within  1,000 feet) and a detailed  description  thereof  must be submitted  in accordance  with the rules prescribed  by the Board  and if required  by the Board.

7. Before  any special permit  use is granted,  the applicant  must secure approval  of the proposed  drainage  structure  by the town Engineer  or the consulting  engineers  for the Town of Orangetown  if required  by a Building  Inspector  such Engineer.  The applicant  has not proposed  any new construction  that would  impact the existing drainage.
8. The site development  plan submitted  must show that concrete  sidewalks  and curbs, to be constructed  in accordance  with the specifications  of the Town of Orangetown,  are to be provided,  if required  by the Board.
9. The applicant  shall complete  NFPA  72 Fire Alarm  for the entire building, connected  to Rockland  County  44-Control,  with amber strobe  as per Orangetown Code.
10. A Key box outside of building fo~ ac~ess to ?11 businesses  m~st be i?_stalled~J)-l:3l o  NMOl
11. The tenant shall apply for and maintain Certificate  of Comphance~\¥e~§afuty    –

with the Fire Inspector’s   office.                                                                   I  LJd    6 2 1nr  hlOZ

12. The applicant shall supply emergency  lighting  as per NEC.         £h  2     1

NJ\\013 D rlV ‘J 0  .:! 0  Mf,\Ol

 

 

 

 

DECISION:  In view of the foregoing  and the testimony  and documents  presented,  the Board: RESOLVED,  that the application  for the requested  Special Permit Use  is APPROVED;   and FURTHER  RESOLVED,  that such decision  and the vote thereon  shall become  effective  and be deemed rendered  on the date of adoption  by the Board of the minutes  of which they are a part.

 

 

 

 

General  Conditions:

 

 

(i) The approval  of any variance  or Special Permit  is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject  to those facts shown  on the plans  submitted  and, if applicable,  as amended  at or prior to this hearing,  as hereinabove  recited  or set forth.

 

(ii) Any approval  of a variance  or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance  or Special Permit requested  but only to the extent  such approval  is granted

herein and subject to those conditions,  if any, upon which  such approval  was conditioned which are hereinbefore  set forth.

 

 

 

(iii) The Board gives no approval  of any building  plans,  including,  without  limitation, the accuracy  and structural  integrity  thereof,  of the applicant,  but same have been submitted  to the Board solely for informational   and verification  purposes  relative  to any variances  being requested.

 

 

 

(iv) A building  permit  as well as any other necessary  permits  must be obtained  within a reasonable  period of time following  the filing of this decision  and prior to undertaking any construction  contemplated  in this decision.  To the extent any variance  or Special Permit  granted herein  is subject to any conditions,  the building  department  shall not be

obligated  to issue any necessary  permits  where  any such condition  imposed  should, in the sole judgment  of the building  department,  be first complied  with as contemplated hereunder.  Occupancy  will not be made until,  and unless,  a Certificate  of Occupancy  is issued by the Office of Building,  Zoning  and Planning  Administration   and Enforcement which legally permits  such occupancy.

 

 

 

(v) Any foregoing  variance  or Special  Permit will lapse if any contemplated  construction of the project or any use for which the variance  or Special  Permit is granted  is not substantially  implemented  within  one year of the date of filing of this decision  or that of any other board  of the Town  of Orangetown  granting  any required  final approval  to such project,  whichever  is later, but in any event within  two years of the filing of this decision. Merely obtaining  a Building  Permit   with respect  to construction  or a Certificate  of Occupancy  with respect  to use does not constitute  “substantial  implementation”   for the purposes  hereof.

 

 

30l:L·rn  SY~310 Nh\01

hh i1 wd    sz 1nr   hl02

 

 

 

The foregoing  resolution   to approve  the application  for the requested   Special   Permit  Use was presented  and moved by Mr. Feroldi,   seconded  by Mr. Quinn and carried as follows: Mr. Feroldi,  aye; Ms. Salomon,   aye;  Mr. Quinn,  aye; and  Mr. Sullivan,   aye. Mr. Bosco and Ms.  Castelli  were absent.

 

 

The Administrative  Aide to the Board  is  hereby  authorized,   directed  and empowered  to sign this  decision   and file  a certified  copy thereof  in the office of the Town Clerk.

 

DATED:   July 16, 2014

 

 

ZONING  BOARD  OF APPEALS TOWN  OF ORANGETOWN

 

DISTRIBUTION:

 

APPLICANT

ZBA MEMBERS SUPERVISOR

TOWN BOARD  MEMBERS TOWN ATTORNEY

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY OBZPAE

BUILDING   INSPECTOR-R.A.O.

Administrative   Aide

 

 

TOWN CLERK

HIGHWAY  DEPARTMENT ASSESSOR

DEPT. of ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT. and  ENGINEERING

Fl LE,ZBA, PB

CHAIRMAN,   ZBA,  PB, ACABOR

 

DECISION

 

 

FRONT YARD, SIDE YARD,BUILDING  HEIGHT,  OFF-STREET  LOADING BERTHS, AND PARKING VARIANCES  APPROVED

 

To: John Piccininni

3 7 Ramland  Road

Orangeburg,  New York  10962

ZBA#   14-56

Date:  July 16, 2014

 

 

FROM:  ZONING  BOARD  OF APPEALS:  Town  of Orangetown

 

 

 

ZBA#l4-56:   Application  ofBNM Properties   for variances  from Zoning  Code  (Chapter

43) of the Town of  Orangetown  Code,  Section  3.12, LIO District,  Group CC,  Columns

8   (Front Yard:  100′ required,  30′  & 17.5 proposed  [2 front yards]),  9 (Side Yard:  100′ required,  54.1′  existing),  12 (Building Height:  4.375′  permitted,  35.5’  proposed)  ;  from Section 6.41 (Off-street  loading berths:  5 required,  4 proposed)  and from Section 3 .11, Column  2, LIO District,  Column  6 #6 (factory parking)  and LIO District refers to LO District,  Column  6 # 2 (office parking  [  136 spaces required,  90 spaces provided])  for an addition  to an existing  commercial  building.   The premises  are located  at 3 7 Ramland Road, Orangeburg,  New York and are identified  on the Orangetown  Tax Map as Section

76.08, Block  1, Lot 6; LIO zoning  district.

 

 

 

Heard by the Zoning Board  of Appeals  of the Town  of Orangetown  at a meeting  held on

Wednesday,  July 16, 2014 at which time the Board made the determination  hereinafter set forth.

 

 

 

John Piccininni,  Kathleen  Hennessey  ,Architect,   and Richard  Piccininni  appeared  and testified.

 

The following  documents  were presented:

 

 

1. Architectural  plans dated  12/01/2013  with the latest revision  date of 06/06/ 2014 signed and sealed by Kathleen  Hennessy,  Architect.  (6 pages).
2. Survey dated November  27, 2001 signed by Anthony  R. Celentano,  P.L.S.
3. Planning  Board Decision  #14-11  dated June  11, 2014.

 

 

 

Mr. Sullivan,  Chairman,  made a motion  to open the Public  Hearing  which motion was seconded  by Ms. Salomon  and carried unanimously.

 

On advice of Dennis Michaels,  Deputy Town  Attorney,   counsel to the Zoning  Board of Appeals,  Mr. Sullivan moved  for a Board  determination  that since the Planning  board noticed its intent to declare  itself Lead Agency  and distributed  that notice of intention  to all Involved  Agencies,  including  the ZBA who consented  or did not object to the Planning  board  acting as Lead Agency  for this application,  pursuant  to coordinated review under  State Environmental   Quality  Review  Act (SEQRA}, pursuant  to SEQRA

Regulations  §617.6 (b) (3); and since the Planning  board  conducted  a SEQRA review on

June  11, 2014, rendered  an environmental   determination   of no significant  adverse environmental  impacts  from the  proposed  land use action i.e., a “Negative  Declaration” or “Neg Dec”),  the ZBA is bound by the Planning  Board’s  Neg Dec and the ZBA cannot require  further  SEQRA review pursuant  to SEQRA  Regulation  §617.6 (b) (3). The motion  was seconded  by Ms. Salomon  and carried as follows:  Mr. Feroldi,  aye; Ms. Salomon,  aye;  Mr. Quinn,  aye; and Mr. Sullivan,  aye. Ms. Castelli  and  Mr. Bosco were absent.

3 a 1.:U o S :.1 \! 31  o  N /A 01

hh   21   LJd    sz 1nr   hlOZ

N/A013DiH!l.lO   so i·U.\01

 

BNM Properties

ZBA#14-56

Page 2 of  4

 

 

 

Kathleen  Hennessy,  Architect,  testified  that they are proposing  an expansion  to the

ground  floor of the building  for additional  factory  space and a second floor expansion  for additional  office space; that the proposed  road dedication  is the trigger for the front yard and building  height variances;  that they have added additional  parking but parking is not an issue because  of the number  of employees.

 

John Piccininni  testified  that the building  was built in 1988 and Bendix  Moldings operated  from the building;  that he purchased  the Oproperty and has an Architectural woodworking   company  occupying  a portion  of the building;  that they need to expand and he would like  to accommodate  them because  they are excellent  tenants;  that he does not want to lose  them.

 

Richard  Piccininni  testified  that since they first occupied  the building  the Tennis  Courts and Crestron have been built.

 

 

 

Public Comment:

 

 

No public  comment.

 

 

The Board members  made personal  inspections  of the premises  the week before  the meeting  and found them to be properly  posted  and as generally  described  on the application.

 

A satisfactory  statement  in accordance  with the provisions  of Section  809 of the General

Municipal  Law of New York was received.

 

Mr. Sullivan made a motion  to close the Public  Hearing  which motion  was seconded  by

Ms. Salomon  and carried unanimously.

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal  observation  of the property,  hearing  all the testimony  and reviewing  all the documents  submitted,  the Board found and concluded  that the benefits  to the applicant  if the variance(s)  are granted  outweigh  the detriment  (if any) to the health,  safety and

welfare  of the neighborhood  or community  by such grant, for the following  reasons:

 

 

 

1. The requested front yard, side yard, building height, loading berth and parking variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The proposed road dedication to the town is, in part, a factor in the requested variances and the building is located in an industrial

park and the addition is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood.

 

2. The requested front yard, side yard, building height, loading berth and parking variances will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed road dedication to the Town is, in part, a factor in the requested variances and the building is located in an industrial park and the addition is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood.

 

 

 

3. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining variances.

 

4. TI1~ requested front yard, side yard, bui.ldingheight, loading berth, a~d park~~ Sy~~ J 1 () N f1i\0 l

vanances, although somewhat substantial, afford benefits to the apphcin\\fuit’ are not

outweighed  by the detriment,  if any, to the health,  safety and welfare  ofthil      \Jd    OZ 1nr   hlfil

surrounding neighborhood or nearby community.                                 \,~     ..           ‘                       ,              … :  “01

“•\\-:  \’.  0  j   0  \’d1\    –

Nh\Ol3vrn  u

 

BNM Properties

ZBA#14-56

Page  3   of  4

 

 

 

5. The applicant  purchased  the property  subject  to Orangetown’s   Zoning  Code (Chapter

43) and is proposing  a new addition  and/or improvements,   so the alleged difficulty was self-created,  which  consideration  was relevant  to the decision  of the Board of Appeals,  but did not, by itself, preclude  the granting of the area variances.

 

 

 

DECISION:  In view of the foregoing  and the testimony  and documents  presented,  the Board: RESOLVED,  that the application  for the requested  front yard, side yard, building height,  loading  dock and parking  variances  are APPROVED;   and FURTHER RESOLVED,  that such decision  and the vote thereon  shall become  effective  and be

deemed rendered  on the date of adoption  by the Board of the minutes  of which they are a part.

 

 

 

 

General  Conditions:

 

(i) The approval  of any variance  or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown  on the plans submitted  and, if applicable,  as amended  at or prior to this hearing,  as hereinabove  recited  or set forth.

 

(ii) Any approval  of a variance  or Special Permit  by the Board is limited  to the specific variance  or Special Permit  requested  but only to the extent  such approval  is granted

herein and subject to those conditions,  if any, upon which  such approval  was conditioned

which  are hereinbefore  set forth.

 

 

 

(iii) The Board  gives no approval  of any building  plans,  including,  without  limitation, the accuracy  and structural  integrity  thereof,  of the applicant,  but same have been submitted  to the Board solely for informational   and verification  purposes  relative  to any variances  being requested.

 

 

 

(iv) A building  permit  as well as any other necessary  permits  must be obtained  within a reasonable  period  of time following  the filing of this decision  and prior to undertaking any construction  contemplated  in this decision.  To the extent any variance  or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions,  the building  department  shall not be

obligated  to issue any necessary  permits  where  any such condition  imposed  should, in the sole judgment  of the building  department,  be first complied  with as contemplated hereunder.  Occupancy  will not be made until,  and unless,  a Certificate  of Occupancy  is issued by the Office of Building,  Zoning  and Planning  Administration   and Enforcement which  legally permits  such occupancy.

 

 

 

(v) Any foregoing  variance  or Special  Permit  will lapse if any contemplated  construction of the project or any use for which  the variance  or Special Permit  is granted  is not substantially  implemented  within one year of the date of filing of this decision  or that of any other board  of the Town  of Orangetown  granting  any required  final approval  to such project,  whichever  is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision. Merely  obtaining  a Building  Permit   with respect  to construction  or a Certificate  of Occupancy  with respect  to use does not constitute  “substantial  implementation”   for the

 

purposes  hereof.

 

BNM Properties

ZBA#I4-56

Page 4 of 4

 

The foregoing  resolution  to approve the application for the requested front yard,  side yard,  building  height,  loading dock,  and parking variances    was presented   and moved by Ms.  Salomon,  seconded  by Mr.  Sullivan  and carried  as follows:    Mr. Feroldi,  aye; Ms. Salomon,  aye; Mr. Quinn,  aye;  and   Mr. Sullivan,  aye.  Mr. Bosco and Ms.  Castelli  were absent.

 

 

The Administrative   Aide to the Board is hereby authorized,   directed and empowered to sign this decision   and  file  a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town  Clerk.

 

DATED:   July 16,  2014

 

ZONING  BOARD  OF APPEALS TOWN  OF ORANGETOWN

 

DISTRIBUTION:

 

APPUCANT

ZBA  MEMBERS SUPERVISOR

TOWN BOARD  MEMBERS TOWN A1TORNEY

DEPUTY  TOWN ATTORNEY OBZPAE

BUILDfNG INSPECTOR-N.A.

By–l”–k~=——=’—–‘l;=b-<~

Deborah  Arbolino

Administrative   Aide

 

 

TOWN  CLERK

HIGHWAY    DEPARTMENT ASSESSOR

DEPT.   of ENYIRONM    ENT AL MGMT.   and  ENGINEERING l’ILE,Zl3A,  PB

CHAIRMAN,     ZBA, PB, ACABOR

 

DECISION

 

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR GENERATOR  APPROVED

 

To:  Patrick O’Reilly

Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory

61Route9W

Palisades, New York 10964

ZBA # 14-57

Date: July 16, 2014

 

 

FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown

 

 

ZBA#l4-57: Application of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory for approval of Performance Standards pursuant to  Zoning Code (Chapter 43) of the Town of Orangetown Code, R-80 District, Section 4.12  for an emergency generator. The premises are located at 61Route9W, Palisades, New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 80.10, Block  1, Lot 2; R-80 zoning district.

 

 

 

Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on Wednesday, July 16, 2014 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth.

 

 

 

Patrick O’Reilly  appeared and testified. The following documents were presented:

1. Plans labeled “Borehole Research Generator Installation” dated 08/0112013with the latest revision date of 04/24/ 2014 signed and sealed by Peter C. Rowland, P.E. (8 pages).
2. Overall Site Map dated November 22, 2006 with the latest revision date of

0611412006 signed and sealed by John R. Atzl, L.S..

3. A letter of explanation dated June 18, 2014 with pictures attached.
4. Performance Standards Resume of Operations dated June 19, 2014.
5. Fire Prevention Supplement.
6. Cummings Power Generation Exhaust Emission Data Sheet (5 pages).
7. Sound-attenuated and weather -protective enclosures (4 Pages).
8. Generator set noise solutions (6 pages).
9. A letter dated June 25, 2014 from the Department of Environmental Management and Engineering, Town of Orangetown signed by Joseph J. Moran, P.E., Commissioner.
10. A memorandum dated June 23, 2014 from Michael B. Bettmann, Chief Fire

Inspector, Town of Orangetown.

 

 

 

Mr. Sullivan, Chairman, made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried unanimously.

 

On advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney,  counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan moved that since the application entails the ZBA engaging in reviews to determine compliance with technical requirements, this application is exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations §617.5 (c) (28); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried as follows: Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Feroldi, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; and Mr. Sullivan, aye. Mr. Bosco and Ms. Castelli were

 

Lamont Doherty  Generator

ZBA#14-57

Page 2 of  4

 

 

Patrick  O’Reilly  testified  that the Natural  Science  Foundation  has purchased  the generator  for the Borehole  Research  building  located  on Lamont  Campus;  that this computer  center hosts a data repository  and server  supporting  the International  Ocean Drilling  Program;  that this program  investigates  the geology  of the earth’s  crust by drilling holes at the bottom  of the sea floor and recovering  cores foe examination, cataloging  and testing;  the program  has been interrupted  by power  failures in the past, typically  for less than a few hours in length; that over the past three years the failures have been more frequent  for much longer periods  of time; that the new 85 KW natural gas standby  generator  will keep the server on line; and its location  between  out building and the neighboring  residence  will retard the transmission   of noise in that direction;  and

the installation  occurs entirely  on private  property  and is not within the view shed of any

public  street or place or within the view shed of any adjoining  residential  properties.

 

 

 

Public Comment:

 

 

No public comment.

 

The Performance  Standards  Resume  of Operations  and Equipment,  and the Fire

Prevention  Supplement  completed  by the applicant  were thereupon  reviewed  in detail.

 

 

The Board members  made personal  inspections  of the premises  the week before the meeting  and found them to be properly  posted  and as generally  described  on the application.

 

A satisfactory  statement  in accordance  with the provisions  of Section  809 of the General

Municipal  Law of New York was received.

 

Mr. Sullivan made a motion  to close the Public  Hearing  which motion  was seconded  by

Ms. Salomon  and carried unanimously.

 

 

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal  observation  of the property,  hearing  all the testimony  and reviewing  the documents  presented,  the Board  found and concluded  that:

 

 

 

1. Based upon the information contained  in the applicant’s   Resume  of Operations and Equipment,  the Fire Prevention  Supplement,  the letter dated June 25, 2014 from Joseph J. Moran,  P .E., Commissioner   of the Orangetown  Department  of Environmental  Management   and Engineering  (DEME)  concluding  that  there is

no reasonable  doubt as to the likelihood  of applicant’s   conformance  to the Zoning Code § 4.1 Performance  Standards,  the memorandum   dated June 23, 2014 from Michael  B. Bettmann, Chief Fire Inspector, Town of Orangetown Bureau of Fire Prevention; the other documents presented to the Board and the testimony of applicant’s representatives, the Board finds and concludes that conformance with the Performance Standards set forth in Zoning Code Section 4.1 will result sufficient to warrant the issuance of a Building Permit and/or Certificate of Occupancy, subject to compliance with the orders, rules and regulations of the Orangetown Office of Building, Zoning & Planning Administration & Enforcement, DEME, and Orangetown, and all other departments having jurisdiction of the premises.

 

 

ZBA#14-57

PageJ   of  4

 

DECISION:  In view of the foregoing  and the testimony  and documents  presented,  the Board:  RESOLVED,  that the application  for  Performance   Standards  conformance, pursuant  to Zoning  Code§   4.1, is APPROVED  with the SPECIFIC  CONDITION   that the  applicant  adhere to all of the requirements   set forth by the Chief Fire Inspector,  Town of Orangetown,  letter dated  June 23, 2014;  AND FURTHER  RESOLVED,  that  such decision  and the vote thereon  shall become  effective  and be deemed rendered  on the date of adoption  by the Board of the minutes  of which  they are a part.

 

General  Conditions:

 

 

(i) The approval  of any variance,  Performance  Standards  Approval,  or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance  with and subject  to those facts shown on the plans submitted  and, if applicable,  as amended  at or prior to this hearing,  as hereinabove  recited or set forth.

 

 

 

(ii) Any approval  of a variance,  Performance   Standards  Approval,  or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance  or Special Permit requested  but only to the extent such approval  is granted herein  and subject  to those conditions,  if any, upon which such approval  was conditioned  which  are hereinbefore   set forth.

 

 

 

(iii) The Board  gives no approval  of any building  plans, including,  without  limitation, the accuracy  and structural  integrity  thereof,  of the applicant,  but same have been submitted  to the Board solely for informational  and verification  purposes  relative  to any variances  being requested.

 

 

 

(iv) A building  permit  as well as any other necessary  permits  must be obtained  within a reasonable  period  of time following  the filing of this decision  and prior to undertaking any construction  contemplated  in this decision.  To the extent any variance,  performance standards  approval,  or Special Permit  granted herein  is subject to any conditions,  the

building  department  shall not be obligated  to issue any necessary  permits  where any such condition  imposed  should,  in the sole judgment  of the building  department,  be first complied  with as contemplated  hereunder.  Occupancy  will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate  of Occupancy  is issued by the Office  of Building,  Zoning  and Planning Administration   and Enforcement  which legally  permits  such occupancy.

 

 

 

(v) Any foregoing  variance,  Performance  Standards  Review,  or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated  construction  of the project  or any use for which the variance  or Special Permit  is granted  is not substantially  implemented  within one year of the date of filing of this decision  or that of any other board  of the Town  of Orangetown  granting  any required  final approval  to such project,  whichever  is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision.   Merely  obtaining  a Building  Permit   with respect to construction  or a Certificate  of Occupancy  with respect  to use does not constitute “substantial  implementation”   for the purposes  hereof.

 

 

ZBA#l4-57

Page 4 of  4

 

 

 

The foregoing  resolution   to approve  the application   for Zoning  Code § 4.1   Performance Standards   conformance  with  the SPECIFIC   CONDITION   that  the applicant  adhere to all of the requirements  set forth by the Chief Fire Inspector,   Town of Orangetown,    letter dated  June 23, 2014;    was presented   and moved  by Mr. Sullivan,   seconded  by Mr. Quinn and ca.nied as  follows:    Mr.  Sullivan,   aye;  Mr. Feroldi,   aye; Ms.  Salomon,   aye; and  Mr. Quinn,  aye.   Mr.  Bosco and Ms.  Castelli   were absent.

 

The Administrative  Aide to the Board  is  hereby  authorized,   directed   and empowered  to sign  this decision   and file  a certified  copy thereof in  the office of the Town  Clerk.

 

DATED:    July  16,   2014

 

 

DISTRIBUTION:

 

APPLICANT

ZBA   MEMBERS SUPERVISOR

TOWN  BOARD  MEMBERS TOWN  ATTORNEY

DEPUTY    TOWN  ATTORNEY OBZPAE

BUILDING     INSPECTOR-B.vW.

 

ZONING  BOARD  OF APPEALS TOWN  OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

 

 

By_.L.._J..L.L.QL~=–=-_LL~~

Deborah  Arbolino

Administrative   Aide

 

 

TOWN   CLERK

HIGHWAY      DEPARTMENT ASSESSOR

DEPT.  of ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT.   and  ENGINEERING FILE,ZBA,    PB

CHAIRMAN,     ZBA,  PB,   ACABOR

 

DECISION

 

 

PERFORMANCE     STANDARDS   FOR  CONDENSER     APPROVED

 

To:  Donald Brenner  (Caribbean)

4 Independence  A venue

Tappan,  New York  10983

ZBA # 14-58

Date:  July  16, 2014

 

 

FROM:  ZONING  BOARD  OF APPEALS:  Town  of Orangetown

 

 

ZBA#14-58:  Application  of Caribbean  Food Delight  for approval  of  Performance Standards,  pursuant  to Zoning  Code  (Chapter  43) of the Town of Orangetown  Code, LI District,  Section 4.12  for a condenser.  The premises  are located  at 117 Route 303, Tappan,  New York and are identified  on the Orangetown  Tax Map as Section  74.19, Block   1, Lot  2; LI zoning

 

 

 

 

Heard by the Zoning  Board  of Appeals  of the Town  of Orangetown  at a meeting  held on

Wednesday,  July  16, 2014 at which time the Board made the determination  hereinafter set forth.

 

 

 

Donald Brenner,  attorney  and Frank Hughes  appeared  and testified. The following  documents  were presented:

1. Plans for Caribbean Foods Delight   dated 04/04/2014  with the latest revision  date of 0411612014 signed and sealed by Sherif El-Far P.E. (1 page)
2. Colmac Coil plan (1 page).
3. RAE Sound Estimate dated 05/29/2014 (1 page).
4. Century Refrigeration project #114675 Caribbean Foods (6 pages)
5. Material Safety Data Sheets (7 pages).
6. Resume of Operations and Equipment form dated May 28, 2014.
7. Fire Prevention supplement.
8. A letter dated July 9, 2014 from the County of Rockland Department of Planning signed by Douglas J. Schuetz, Acting Commissioner of Planning.
9. A letter dated June 25, 2014 from the Department of Environmental Management and Engineering, town of Orangetown signed by Joseph J. Moran, P.E., Commissioner.
10. A Memorandum dated June 23, 2014 from Michael B. Bettmann, Chief Fire

Inspector.

 

 

 

Mr. Sullivan, Chairman, made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried unanimously.

 

 

 

On advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney,  counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan moved that since the application entails the ZBA engaging in reviews to determine compliance with technical requirements, this application is exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations §617.5 (c) (28); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried as follows: Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Feroldi, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; and Mr. Sullivan, aye. Mr. Bosco and Ms. Castelli were absent.

 

3 Q 1.:L:iO S )Pf:ll   Q   N It\ 0 l

Donald Brenner testified that the new condenser is needed to cool the lab~etoZiFst.~.!J e’a~   1nr  hlGl

side of the building; that they are well within the roadway and on the groillla ana Wi11 not

·     ,  ……    v

be visible from any other property; and that the sound ratings have been suNbffmiCiJtIt.:ei dv, 11· •  ·~’    ,  :  n  .:i’   o  l-1 /;\OJ_

 

Caribbean  Food condenser

ZBA#14-58

Page 2 of  4

 

 

 

Public  Comment:

 

 

No public  comment.

 

 

The Performance  Standards  Resume  of Operations  and Equipment,  and the Fire

Prevention  Supplement  completed  by the applicant  were thereupon  reviewed  in detail.

 

 

The Board members  made personal  inspections  of the premises  the week before the meeting  and found them to be properly  posted  and as generally  described  on the application.

 

A satisfactory  statement  in accordance  with the provisions  of Section  809 of the General

Municipal  Law of New York was received.

 

 

Mr. Sullivan made a motion  to close the Public  Hearing  which motion  was seconded by

Ms. Salomon  and carried unanimously.

 

 

 

FINDINGS  OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal  observation  of the property,  hearing  all the testimony  and reviewing  the documents  presented,  the Board found and concluded  that:

 

 

 

1. Based upon the information  contained  in the applicant’s   Resume  of Operations and Equipment,  the Fire Prevention  Supplement,  the letter dated June 25, 2014 from Joseph  J. Moran,  P .E., Commissioner   of the Orangetown  Department  of Environmental  Management  and Engineering  (DEME)  concluding  that  there is no reasonable  doubt as to the likelihood  of applicant’s   conformance  to the Zoning Code§  4.1 Performance  Standards,  the memorandum   dated June 23, 2014 from Michael  B. Bettmann, Chief Fire Inspector, Town of Orangetown Bureau of Fire Prevention; the other documents presented to the Board and the testimony of applicant’s representatives, the Board finds and concludes that conformance with the Performance Standards set forth in Zoning  Code Section 4.1 will result sufficient to warrant the issuance of a Building Permit and/or Certificate of Occupancy, subject to compliance with the orders, rules and regulations of the Orangetown Office of Building, Zoning & Planning Administration & Enforcement, DEME, and Orangetown Fire Inspector., and all other departments having jurisdiction of the premises.

 

 

Caribbean  Food condenser

ZBA#14-58

Page 3 of  4

 

 

DECISION:  In view of the foregoing  and the testimony  and documents  presented,  the Board:  RESOLVED,  that the application  for the Performance  Standards  conformance, pursuant  to Zoning  Code  § 4.1, is APPROVED   with the SPECIFIC  CONDITION   that the  applicant  adhere to all of the requirements   set forth by the Chief Fire Inspector,  Town of Orangetown,  letter dated  June 23, 2014;  AND FURTHER  RESOLVED,  that  such decision  and the vote thereon  shall become  effective  and be deemed rendered  on the date of adoption  by the Board  of the minutes  of which  they are a part.

 

General  Conditions:

 

 

(i) The approval  of any variance,  Performance   Standards  Approval,  or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance  with and subject  to those facts shown on the plans submitted  and, if applicable,  as amended  at or prior to this hearing,  as hereinabove  recited or set forth.

 

 

 

(ii) Any approval  of a variance,  Performance   Standards  Approval,  or Special Permit by the Board is limited  to the specific variance  or Special Permit requested  but only to the extent such approval  is granted  herein  and subject  to those conditions,  if any, upon which such approval  was conditioned  which  are hereinbefore  set forth.

 

 

 

(iii) The Board gives no approval  of any building  plans,  including,  without  limitation, the accuracy  and structural  integrity  thereof,  of the applicant,  but same have been submitted  to the Board solely for informational   and verification  purposes  relative to any variances  being requested.

 

 

 

(iv) A building  permit  as well as any other necessary  permits  must be obtained  within a reasonable  period  of time following  the filing of this decision  and prior to undertaking any construction  contemplated  in this decision.  To the extent any variance,  performance standards  approval,  or Special Permit  granted herein  is subject  to any conditions,  the

building  department  shall not be obligated  to issue any necessary  permits  where any such

condition  imposed  should, in the sole judgment  of the building  department,  be first complied  with as contemplated  hereunder.  Occupancy  will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate  of Occupancy  is issued by the Office of Building,  Zoning  and Planning Administration   and Enforcement  which  legally permits  such occupancy.

 

 

 

(v) Any foregoing  variance,  Performance  Standards  Review,  or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated  construction  of the project  or any use for which the variance  or Special Permit is granted  is not substantially  implemented  within  one year of the date of filing of this decision  or that of any other board  of the Town  of Orangetown  granting  any required  final approval  to such project,  whichever  is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision.   Merely  obtaining  a Building  Permit   with respect  to construction  or a Certificate  of Occupancy  with respect  to use does not constitute “substantial  implementation”   for the purposes  hereof.

 

 

Caribbean   Food condenser

ZBA#14-58

Page 4 of  4

 

 

 

The foregoing  resolution  to approve  the application  for Zoning  Code§   4.1   Performance Standards   conformance  with the SPECIFIC  CONDITION  that  the applicant  adhere to all of the requirements  set forth by the Chief Fire Inspector,   Town  of Orangetown,   letter

elated   June 23,  2014;   was presented  and moved by Mr. Sullivan,    seconded  by Ms.

Salomon  and carried as follows:    Mr. Sullivan,   aye;  Mr. Feroldi,  aye; Ms. Salomon,    aye;

and  Mr. Quinn,  aye.   Mr. Bosco  and Ms.  Castelli  were absent.

 

The Administrative  Aide  to the Board is hereby  authorized,   directed  and empowered  to sign  this decision   and file a certified  copy thereof  in the office  of the Town Clerk.

 

DATED:    July 16,   2014

 

 

DISTRIBUTION:

 

APPLICANT

ZBA MEMBERS SUPERVISOR

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS TOWN ATTORNEY

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY OBZPAE

BUILDING   INSPECTOR-M.M.

 

ZONING  BOARD  OF APPEALS TOWN  OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

Administrative    Aide

 

 

TOWN  CLERK

HIGHWAY  DEPARTMENT ASSESSOR

DEPT. of ENVIRONMENTAL

MGMT. and ENGINEERING [‘ILE,ZBA,   PB

CHAIRMAN,   ZBA, PB, ACAl30R